The article focuses on the analysis of how philosophy, in general, and the philosophy of law, in particular, could be exploited to solve some problems facing today's science and social practice. Considering the fact that many difficulties of contemporary human beings are related to the processes through which the whole society has passed, and education and research institutions, in particular, therefore we consider that the scientific normative field should be rethought,from the perspective ofthe contribution they could and should have to educate and train human beingsfrom both a moral and a legal perspective. From the vast area of domains, the configuration of the legal science offersthe best premises to re-evaluate and rethink from this perspective, and are the ones onwhich the current articlewillreflect. Forthisreason,there are at least two considerations as the basis: one is due to their normative dimension, which at first, in the Aristotelian argument makes a common body with morality; another one is due to the decisive role of the representatives of the legal professional environment in promoting respectof conduct according to the normality standards. As a priority,we intend to highlightthe areas that had been and should remain the foundation on which the scientific basis of law is built, a benchmark ofsocialrelations and a pillar on which human action isrelated. Keywords: transition, epistemic status, philosophy of law, integration, complexity, interdisciplinarity.