Conţinutul numărului revistei |
Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
727 44 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2024-04-25 11:23 |
Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
347.91/.95 (120) |
Procedură legală. Personal judiciar şi organizare judiciară (948) |
SM ISO690:2012 FALĂ, Nicolae, ŞPAC, Vadim. Temeiurile casării sau modificării hotărârii judecdatorești în ordine de apel. In: Studii Juridice Universitare, 2017, nr. 3-4(39-40), pp. 140-167. ISSN 1857-4122. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Studii Juridice Universitare | ||||||
Numărul 3-4(39-40) / 2017 / ISSN 1857-4122 | ||||||
|
||||||
CZU: 347.91/.95 | ||||||
Pag. 140-167 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
The system of grounds for cassation or modification of the decision of the court of first instance in the order of appeal is based on the legality and the soundness of any disposition act of the court. Thus, the grounds for cassation provided by art. 386 par. (1) let. a) -c) Civil Procedure Code is a means of invoking the lawlessness, and art. 386 par. (1) let. d), subsequently developed by art. 387 and 388 of the Civil Procedure Code, is the means of invoking the unlawfulness of the decision of the court of first instance. The present investigation is an attempt to uncover the limits of the extension of the cassation grounds and their individualisation criteria. It has also been pointed to the idea of identifying some inconsistencies and legal controversies, coming up with possible solutions. The authentic meaning of the term “cassation” implies some suggestive connotations: the competent court to judge at this stage of the trial; the cassation procedure and its outcome, ie the abolition of the disputed judicial act for reasons of unlawfulness. |
||||||
Cuvinte-cheie appeal, court order, merits, legality, cassation, apel, hotărâre judecătorească, temeinicie, legalitate, temei de casare |
||||||
|
Crossref XML Export
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?> <doi_batch version='4.3.7' xmlns='http://www.crossref.org/schema/4.3.7' xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' xsi:schemaLocation='http://www.crossref.org/schema/4.3.7 http://www.crossref.org/schema/deposit/crossref4.3.7.xsd'> <head> <doi_batch_id>ibn-91626</doi_batch_id> <timestamp>1714495236</timestamp> <depositor> <depositor_name>Information Society Development Instiute, Republic of Moldova</depositor_name> <email_address>idsi@asm.md</email_address> </depositor> <registrant>Universitatea Liberă Internaţională din Moldova</registrant> </head> <body> <journal> <journal_metadata> <full_title>Studii Juridice Universitare</full_title> <issn media_type='print'>18574122</issn> </journal_metadata> <journal_issue> <publication_date media_type='print'> <year>2017</year> </publication_date> <issue>3-4(39-40)</issue> </journal_issue> <journal_article publication_type='full_text'><titles> <title>Temeiurile casării sau modificării hotărârii judecdatorești în ordine de apel</title> </titles> <contributors> <person_name sequence='first' contributor_role='author'> <given_name>Nicolae</given_name> <surname>Fală</surname> </person_name> <person_name sequence='additional' contributor_role='author'> <given_name>Vadim</given_name> <surname>Şpac</surname> </person_name> </contributors> <publication_date media_type='print'> <year>2017</year> </publication_date> <pages> <first_page>140</first_page> <last_page>167</last_page> </pages> </journal_article> </journal> </body> </doi_batch>