Conţinutul numărului revistei |
Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
768 8 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2023-11-09 08:47 |
Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
902/904"0/03"(4) (1) |
Arheologie (937) |
Preistorie. Vestigii preistorice, artefacte, antichități (2097) |
Vestigii culturale ale diferitelor perioade istorice (3383) |
SM ISO690:2012 COROBCEAN, Andrei. Vestigiile secolelor V-III a. Chr. din spațiul Carpato-Nistrean ca sursă a interpretării etnice. Aspecte istoriografice. In: Tyragetia. Serie nouă, 2014, nr. 1(23), pp. 275-286. ISSN 1857-0240. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Tyragetia. Serie nouă | ||||||
Numărul 1(23) / 2014 / ISSN 1857-0240 /ISSNe 2537-6330 | ||||||
|
||||||
CZU: 902/904"0/03"(4) | ||||||
Pag. 275-286 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
The question on ethnic interpretation of archaeological sites of second half of the 1st millenium BC in the Carpathian-Dniester region is one of the cores in archaeological literature. The majority of the generalizing works, devoted to a given circle of sites, define an ethnic or ethno-cultural attribution through ethnic criteria of the archeological finds. The specific character of a funeral ceremony and style of material culture, in particular ceramics, has a special role. Correlation of archeological data to written sources remains the main argument and motivation of ethno-cultural definitions and reconstruction. Despite of ambiguity of historical-archeological parities, that predetermines sometimes opposite sights at treatment of ethno-geographical information of ancient sources, by way of ethnic character of some features of a funeral ceremony, style of ceramics and art objects a certain consensus is shown. In given article the basic tendencies of a historiography in the field of ethnic treatment of different categories of archeological sources are considered. |
||||||
|
Dublin Core Export
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?> <oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/' xmlns:oai_dc='http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/' xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' xsi:schemaLocation='http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd'> <dc:creator>Corobcean, A.</dc:creator> <dc:date>2014-06-02</dc:date> <dc:description xml:lang='en'>The question on ethnic interpretation of archaeological sites of second half of the 1st millenium BC in the Carpathian-Dniester region is one of the cores in archaeological literature. The majority of the generalizing works, devoted to a given circle of sites, define an ethnic or ethno-cultural attribution through ethnic criteria of the archeological finds. The specific character of a funeral ceremony and style of material culture, in particular ceramics, has a special role. Correlation of archeological data to written sources remains the main argument and motivation of ethno-cultural definitions and reconstruction. Despite of ambiguity of historical-archeological parities, that predetermines sometimes opposite sights at treatment of ethno-geographical information of ancient sources, by way of ethnic character of some features of a funeral ceremony, style of ceramics and art objects a certain consensus is shown. In given article the basic tendencies of a historiography in the field of ethnic treatment of different categories of archeological sources are considered.</dc:description> <dc:description xml:lang='ru'>Вопрос об этнической интерпретации археологических памятников второй половины I тыс. до н. э. в карпато-днестровском регионе является одним из основных в историографии. Большинство обобщающих работ, посвященных данному кругу памятников, определяют этническую или этнокультурную атрибуцию посредством «этнизации» археологических признаков. Особую роль в этом плане сыграли специфика погребального обряда и стиль материальной культуры, в частности керамики. Сопоставление собственно археологических данных с письменными источниками остаётся главным аргументом и мотивацией этнокультурных определений и реконструкций. Несмотря на неоднозначность историко-археологических соотношений, что предопределяет иногда противоположные взгляды на трактовку этногеографических ин- формаций античных источников, в плане этнического характера некоторых особенностей погребального обряда, стиля керамики и предметов искусства проявляется некий консенсус. В данной статье рассмотрены основные тенденции историографии в области этнической трактовки разных категорий археологических источников.</dc:description> <dc:source>Tyragetia. Serie nouă 23 (1) 275-286</dc:source> <dc:title>Vestigiile secolelor V-III a. Chr. din spațiul Carpato-Nistrean ca sursă a interpretării etnice. Aspecte istoriografice</dc:title> <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type> </oai_dc:dc>