Conţinutul numărului revistei |
Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
762 8 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2023-11-09 08:47 |
Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
902/904"0/03"(4) (1) |
Arheologie (937) |
Preistorie. Vestigii preistorice, artefacte, antichități (2097) |
Vestigii culturale ale diferitelor perioade istorice (3383) |
SM ISO690:2012 COROBCEAN, Andrei. Vestigiile secolelor V-III a. Chr. din spațiul Carpato-Nistrean ca sursă a interpretării etnice. Aspecte istoriografice. In: Tyragetia. Serie nouă, 2014, nr. 1(23), pp. 275-286. ISSN 1857-0240. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Tyragetia. Serie nouă | ||||||
Numărul 1(23) / 2014 / ISSN 1857-0240 /ISSNe 2537-6330 | ||||||
|
||||||
CZU: 902/904"0/03"(4) | ||||||
Pag. 275-286 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
The question on ethnic interpretation of archaeological sites of second half of the 1st millenium BC in the Carpathian-Dniester region is one of the cores in archaeological literature. The majority of the generalizing works, devoted to a given circle of sites, define an ethnic or ethno-cultural attribution through ethnic criteria of the archeological finds. The specific character of a funeral ceremony and style of material culture, in particular ceramics, has a special role. Correlation of archeological data to written sources remains the main argument and motivation of ethno-cultural definitions and reconstruction. Despite of ambiguity of historical-archeological parities, that predetermines sometimes opposite sights at treatment of ethno-geographical information of ancient sources, by way of ethnic character of some features of a funeral ceremony, style of ceramics and art objects a certain consensus is shown. In given article the basic tendencies of a historiography in the field of ethnic treatment of different categories of archeological sources are considered. |
||||||
|
Cerif XML Export
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?> <CERIF xmlns='urn:xmlns:org:eurocris:cerif-1.5-1' xsi:schemaLocation='urn:xmlns:org:eurocris:cerif-1.5-1 http://www.eurocris.org/Uploads/Web%20pages/CERIF-1.5/CERIF_1.5_1.xsd' xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' release='1.5' date='2012-10-07' sourceDatabase='Output Profile'> <cfResPubl> <cfResPublId>ibn-ResPubl-34659</cfResPublId> <cfResPublDate>2014-06-02</cfResPublDate> <cfVol>23</cfVol> <cfIssue>1</cfIssue> <cfStartPage>275</cfStartPage> <cfISSN>1857-0240</cfISSN> <cfURI>https://ibn.idsi.md/ro/vizualizare_articol/34659</cfURI> <cfTitle cfLangCode='RO' cfTrans='o'>Vestigiile secolelor V-III a. Chr. din spațiul Carpato-Nistrean ca sursă a interpretării etnice. Aspecte istoriografice</cfTitle> <cfAbstr cfLangCode='EN' cfTrans='o'>The question on ethnic interpretation of archaeological sites of second half of the 1st millenium BC in the Carpathian-Dniester region is one of the cores in archaeological literature. The majority of the generalizing works, devoted to a given circle of sites, define an ethnic or ethno-cultural attribution through ethnic criteria of the archeological finds. The specific character of a funeral ceremony and style of material culture, in particular ceramics, has a special role. Correlation of archeological data to written sources remains the main argument and motivation of ethno-cultural definitions and reconstruction. Despite of ambiguity of historical-archeological parities, that predetermines sometimes opposite sights at treatment of ethno-geographical information of ancient sources, by way of ethnic character of some features of a funeral ceremony, style of ceramics and art objects a certain consensus is shown. In given article the basic tendencies of a historiography in the field of ethnic treatment of different categories of archeological sources are considered.</cfAbstr> <cfAbstr cfLangCode='RU' cfTrans='o'>Вопрос об этнической интерпретации археологических памятников второй половины I тыс. до н. э. в карпато-днестровском регионе является одним из основных в историографии. Большинство обобщающих работ, посвященных данному кругу памятников, определяют этническую или этнокультурную атрибуцию посредством «этнизации» археологических признаков. Особую роль в этом плане сыграли специфика погребального обряда и стиль материальной культуры, в частности керамики. Сопоставление собственно археологических данных с письменными источниками остаётся главным аргументом и мотивацией этнокультурных определений и реконструкций. Несмотря на неоднозначность историко-археологических соотношений, что предопределяет иногда противоположные взгляды на трактовку этногеографических ин- формаций античных источников, в плане этнического характера некоторых особенностей погребального обряда, стиля керамики и предметов искусства проявляется некий консенсус. В данной статье рассмотрены основные тенденции историографии в области этнической трактовки разных категорий археологических источников.</cfAbstr> <cfResPubl_Class> <cfClassId>eda2d9e9-34c5-11e1-b86c-0800200c9a66</cfClassId> <cfClassSchemeId>759af938-34ae-11e1-b86c-0800200c9a66</cfClassSchemeId> <cfStartDate>2014-06-02T24:00:00</cfStartDate> </cfResPubl_Class> <cfResPubl_Class> <cfClassId>e601872f-4b7e-4d88-929f-7df027b226c9</cfClassId> <cfClassSchemeId>40e90e2f-446d-460a-98e5-5dce57550c48</cfClassSchemeId> <cfStartDate>2014-06-02T24:00:00</cfStartDate> </cfResPubl_Class> <cfPers_ResPubl> <cfPersId>ibn-person-13764</cfPersId> <cfClassId>49815870-1cfe-11e1-8bc2-0800200c9a66</cfClassId> <cfClassSchemeId>b7135ad0-1d00-11e1-8bc2-0800200c9a66</cfClassSchemeId> <cfStartDate>2014-06-02T24:00:00</cfStartDate> </cfPers_ResPubl> </cfResPubl> <cfPers> <cfPersId>ibn-Pers-13764</cfPersId> <cfPersName_Pers> <cfPersNameId>ibn-PersName-13764-2</cfPersNameId> <cfClassId>55f90543-d631-42eb-8d47-d8d9266cbb26</cfClassId> <cfClassSchemeId>7375609d-cfa6-45ce-a803-75de69abe21f</cfClassSchemeId> <cfStartDate>2014-06-02T24:00:00</cfStartDate> <cfFamilyNames>Corobcean</cfFamilyNames> <cfFirstNames>Andrei</cfFirstNames> </cfPersName_Pers> </cfPers> </CERIF>