The professional activity of correct and efficient framing of the provisions of the legal norms from the Special Part of the Criminal Code in co-report with the antisocial deed committed in the objective reality, presupposes the impeccable and flawless knowledge of these legislative provisions. The falsifi cation of evidence and forgery in public documents, at first sight, seem to be two criminal norms with the essence of similar legal structures, but in the process of conducting in-depth studies in this research segment, a completely different result was obtained. Therefore, in order to minimize the erroneous qualification of antisocial offenses deployed in art.310 and art.332 of the Criminal Code, we propose to the attention of all interested parties, the scientifi c approach in the order that follows, with the generic title: Theoretical and case study on the delimitation of crimes falsification of evidence of forgery in public documents.