Intersubjectivity designates the reciprocal relationship between individual cognitive skills as a determinant factor of the world and private experience of each individual. Reporting the intersubjectivity theory to the context of public sphere favors highlighting a new attitude in the discursive practices. There are several models of the public sphere. For example, Jürgen Habermas distinguished a discursive type of public sphere. In accordance with this vision the public sphere is understood as the area where public and private opinions intersect, the opinions that represent some obvious cultural views through which economic and political power tries to dominate society, modifying and even forming the opinions of the individuals. The public sphere is constituted by human subjects who represent the world of their lives through public communication. The models in the public sphere are directly dependent on certain political ideologies. These kinds of ideologies apply their normative criteria in the constitution of the public sphere. In Habermas view kantian thematization privileges subjectivity at the expense of intersubjectivity the public space constituting itself by virtue of the fact that individuals actaccording to a principle that should be common to all. From certain perspectives for Hannah Arendt the public domain is this world of useful objects, but not only that. Can be listed a number of factors which contribute to the identifi cation of public sphere, i.e. charity, work, action. The public domain exists where one and the same object is seen by a large number of people from different perspectives and from different aspects, and those people are concerned about the same object examined as an entity in full diversity.