Conţinutul numărului revistei |
Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
805 5 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2024-04-18 11:45 |
Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
94(478+498) (120) |
Istoria Moldovei. Republica Moldova (69) |
Istoria României. Republica România (134) |
SM ISO690:2012 PLOŞNIŢĂ, Elena. Evenimentele premergătoare Unirii de la 1918 reflectate în revista Luminătorul.. In: Tyragetia. Serie nouă, 2018, nr. 2(27), pp. 289-296. ISSN 1857-0240. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Tyragetia. Serie nouă | ||||||
Numărul 2(27) / 2018 / ISSN 1857-0240 /ISSNe 2537-6330 | ||||||
|
||||||
CZU: 94(478+498) | ||||||
Pag. 289-296 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
On March 27, 1918, the Bessarabian Parliament (Sfatul Ţării) voted for the unification of Bessarabia with Romania. Public institutions and the population of the region did not have a unanimous and approving attitude towards the Bessarabian events of 1917-1918, including the unification of Bessarabia with Romania. The Church, after a hundred years of coexistence with the Tsarist autocracy, was in agony, but, nevertheless, played an important role in the life of society. In the article “The events preceding the Union of 1918 reflected in the Luminătorul Magazine” the author analyzes the attitude of the clergy to the social-political events of 1917-1918 and gives the reflection of these events, which culminated in the proclamation of the unification, in the pages of the Luminătorul Magazine. Although during this period in Chişinău there had been publishing several religious publications in Romanian and Russian: Luminătorul, Kishinevskie eparkhial’nye vedomosti, Golos Bessarabskoy tserkvi, the Luminătorul Magazine best covered the events that preceded the unification. The priesthood supported the aspirations of the parishioners to obtain the right to officiate divine service in Romanian. Not all priests supported the unification of 1918, some regarded the canonical connection with the Russian Church as a priority. According to the author, the religious press, including the Luminătorul Magazine, broadly reflected the political life of Bessarabia: the Church and the Provisional Government, the clergy and political life, the national issue, relations between the Church and the State, the agrarian issue, etc. However, the Church took a wait-and-see strategy, made little comment in the press and seldom expressed its attitude to this or that event. The Church had a reserved attitude towards the unification of Bessarabia with Romania, in other words, being accustomed to approving anything that came from the state, it accepted without enthusiasm the unification of Bessarabia with Romania in 1918. The Church could not act otherwise, because its duty was “to obey any legitimate authority and pray for it, such is the will of God. The Church must and can reconcile, cooperate with any authority. She will not reconcile only when the Power encroaches on faith – then the Church will openly defend itself”. |
||||||
Cuvinte-cheie revista Luminătorul, viaţa politică, evenimente social-politice, unirea Basarabiei cu România., biserică |
||||||
|
Cerif XML Export
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?> <CERIF xmlns='urn:xmlns:org:eurocris:cerif-1.5-1' xsi:schemaLocation='urn:xmlns:org:eurocris:cerif-1.5-1 http://www.eurocris.org/Uploads/Web%20pages/CERIF-1.5/CERIF_1.5_1.xsd' xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' release='1.5' date='2012-10-07' sourceDatabase='Output Profile'> <cfResPubl> <cfResPublId>ibn-ResPubl-68839</cfResPublId> <cfResPublDate>2018-11-19</cfResPublDate> <cfVol>27</cfVol> <cfIssue>2</cfIssue> <cfStartPage>289</cfStartPage> <cfISSN>1857-0240</cfISSN> <cfURI>https://ibn.idsi.md/ro/vizualizare_articol/68839</cfURI> <cfTitle cfLangCode='RO' cfTrans='o'>Evenimentele premergătoare Unirii de la 1918 reflectate în revista Luminătorul.</cfTitle> <cfKeyw cfLangCode='RO' cfTrans='o'>revista Luminătorul; viaţa politică; evenimente social-politice; unirea Basarabiei cu România.; biserică</cfKeyw> <cfAbstr cfLangCode='EN' cfTrans='o'><p>On March 27, 1918, the Bessarabian Parliament (Sfatul Ţării) voted for the unification of Bessarabia with Romania. Public institutions and the population of the region did not have a unanimous and approving attitude towards the Bessarabian events of 1917-1918, including the unification of Bessarabia with Romania. The Church, after a hundred years of coexistence with the Tsarist autocracy, was in agony, but, nevertheless, played an important role in the life of society. In the article “The events preceding the Union of 1918 reflected in the <em>Luminătorul </em>Magazine” the author analyzes the attitude of the clergy to the social-political events of 1917-1918 and gives the reflection of these events, which culminated in the proclamation of the unification, in the pages of the <em>Luminătorul </em> Magazine. Although during this period in Chişinău there had been publishing several religious publications in Romanian and Russian: <em>Luminătorul</em>, <em>Kishinevskie eparkhial’nye vedomosti</em>, <em>Golos Bessarabskoy tserkvi</em>, the <em>Luminătorul </em>Magazine best covered the events that preceded the unification. The priesthood supported the aspirations of the parishioners to obtain the right to officiate divine service in Romanian. Not all priests supported the unification of 1918, some regarded the canonical connection with the Russian Church as a priority. According to the author, the religious press, including the <em>Luminătorul </em>Magazine, broadly reflected the political life of Bessarabia: the Church and the Provisional Government, the clergy and political life, the national issue, relations between the Church and the State, the agrarian issue, etc. However, the Church took a wait-and-see strategy, made little comment in the press and seldom expressed its attitude to this or that event. The Church had a reserved attitude towards the unification of Bessarabia with Romania, in other words, being accustomed to approving anything that came from the state, it accepted without enthusiasm the unification of Bessarabia with Romania in 1918. The Church could not act otherwise, because its duty was “to obey any legitimate authority and pray for it, such is the will of God. The Church must and can reconcile, cooperate with any authority. She will not reconcile only when the Power encroaches on faith – then the Church will openly defend itself”. </p></cfAbstr> <cfAbstr cfLangCode='RU' cfTrans='o'><p>27 марта 1918 г. бессарабский парламент (Сфатул Цэрий) проголосовал за объединение Бессарабии с Румынией. Государственные и общественные учреждения и население края не были единодушны в отношении к бессарабским событиям 1917-1918 гг., в том числе по вопросу объединения Бессарабии с Румынией. Церковь, после ста лет сосуществования с царским самодержавием, была в агонии, но, тем не менее, играла важную роль в жизни общества. В статье «События, предшествовавшие объединению 1918 года, нашедшие отражение в журнале «Луминэторул» автор анализирует отношение духовенства к социально-политическим событиям 1917-1918 гг. и представляет отражение этих событий, завершившихся провозглашением объединения, на страницах журнала «Луминэторул». Хотя в этот период в Кишиневе выходило несколько религиозных изданий на румынском и русском языках: «Луминэторул», «Кишиневские епархиальные ведомости», «Голос Бессарабской церкви», лучше всего освещал события, предшествовавшие объединению, журнал «Луминэторул». Духовенство поддержало прихожан, желавших получить право на отправление богослужения на румынском языке. Не все священники поддерживали объединение 1918 года, некоторые считали приоритетом каноническую связь с Русской Церковью. По мнению автора, церковная пресса, в том числе журнал «Луминэторул», широко отражала проблемы политической жизни Бессарабии: Церковь и Временное правительство, духовенство и политическая жизнь, национальный вопрос, отношения между Церковью и государством, аграрный вопрос и т.д. Однако Церковь заняла выжидательную позицию, делала мало комментариев в прессе и редко выражала свое отношение к тому или иному событию. Церковь придерживалась сдержанного отношения к объединению Бессарабии с Румынией, другими словами, привыкшая одобрять все, что шло от власти, от государства, она без особого энтузиазма приняла и объединение Бессарабии с Румынией в 1918 году. Церковь не могла действовать иначе, потому что ее долг состоял в том, чтобы «подчиняться любой законной власти и молиться за нее, такова воля Божья. Церковь должна и может примириться, сотрудничать с любой властью. Не примирится только тогда, когда власть посягнет на веру – тогда Церковь будет открыто защищаться».</p></cfAbstr> <cfResPubl_Class> <cfClassId>eda2d9e9-34c5-11e1-b86c-0800200c9a66</cfClassId> <cfClassSchemeId>759af938-34ae-11e1-b86c-0800200c9a66</cfClassSchemeId> <cfStartDate>2018-11-19T24:00:00</cfStartDate> </cfResPubl_Class> <cfResPubl_Class> <cfClassId>e601872f-4b7e-4d88-929f-7df027b226c9</cfClassId> <cfClassSchemeId>40e90e2f-446d-460a-98e5-5dce57550c48</cfClassSchemeId> <cfStartDate>2018-11-19T24:00:00</cfStartDate> </cfResPubl_Class> <cfPers_ResPubl> <cfPersId>ibn-person-11616</cfPersId> <cfClassId>49815870-1cfe-11e1-8bc2-0800200c9a66</cfClassId> <cfClassSchemeId>b7135ad0-1d00-11e1-8bc2-0800200c9a66</cfClassSchemeId> <cfStartDate>2018-11-19T24:00:00</cfStartDate> </cfPers_ResPubl> </cfResPubl> <cfPers> <cfPersId>ibn-Pers-11616</cfPersId> <cfPersName_Pers> <cfPersNameId>ibn-PersName-11616-2</cfPersNameId> <cfClassId>55f90543-d631-42eb-8d47-d8d9266cbb26</cfClassId> <cfClassSchemeId>7375609d-cfa6-45ce-a803-75de69abe21f</cfClassSchemeId> <cfStartDate>2018-11-19T24:00:00</cfStartDate> <cfFamilyNames>Ploşniţă</cfFamilyNames> <cfFirstNames>Elena</cfFirstNames> </cfPersName_Pers> </cfPers> </CERIF>