Abordări ale soluţionării conflictului din zona nistreană a Republicii Moldova
Închide
Conţinutul numărului revistei
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
689 7
Ultima descărcare din IBN:
2023-02-09 14:09
SM ISO690:2012
LAVRIC, Aurelian. Abordări ale soluţionării conflictului din zona nistreană a Republicii Moldova. In: Moldoscopie, 2012, nr. 1(56), pp. 166-182. ISSN 1812-2566.
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
Moldoscopie
Numărul 1(56) / 2012 / ISSN 1812-2566 /ISSNe 2587-4063

Abordări ale soluţionării conflictului din zona nistreană a Republicii Moldova

Pag. 166-182

Lavric Aurelian
 
Universitatea de Stat din Moldova
 
 
Disponibil în IBN: 16 decembrie 2013


Rezumat

The implication of Russian regular army and the paramilitary forces within 1992 year war on the both banks of the Dniester river showes that it was a Rus-sian - Moldovan territorial conflict. The causes of bursting of the conflict are si-mple: in order to usurp the power within the eastern part of Republic of Moldo-va (RM), the paramilitary forces of Kazaks from Russia attacked the police sta-tions from region. Thus, the conflict began and the so-called Nistrian Moldovan Republic (Nistrenia) was recognized as a part in conflict. Unfortunately, the na-tional and the international media presented for the public opinion a view acco-rding to which there is a separatist regime in the Eastern Moldova. However, it is rather a regime of Russian occupation, based on the presence of the 14th Ru-ssian army and an administration formed by Russian citizens, ruling in Tiras-pol, implementing the commands from Moscow. The single agreement which is followed and respected by the two parts of the conflict is the agreement from July 21, 1992, signed at Moscow by the presidents Eltsin and Snegur, which ultimately finished the war between Russia and Republic of Moldova and did draw the border between the Republic of Moldova and the zone of the Russian occupation on the territory of the Republic of Moldova. The author analyses the Ukrainian and Russian plans of solving the conflict and shows out the manipu-lations used in those documents. Unfortunately, instead of proposing a statute of the Nistrian region in the composition of the Republic of Moldova, Ukrainian and Russian mediators propose an organization mode (a political system) of the Republic of Moldova. Unfortunately, the 5 2 informal format of negotiations is not efficient because Russia is present not as a part of the conflict, but as a me-diator. The origin of the conflict from 1990 to 1992 is within the border marked in 1940, as a result of which the southern and northern Bessarabia were gran-ted by the leadership from Moscow to Ukraine, and Moldova in return was gi-ven a strip on the left bank of the Dniester, which used to belong to Ukraine. As in Nistrian region from the left bank of the Dniester there are Ukrainian locali-ties, as well as in northern Bessarabia there are Moldovan localites, the author proposes a scenario of an exchange of the territories between Moldova and Uk-raine, which could eliminate for good and all the hot spot from the Dniester banks.