Prevalence of viral hepatitis A, B, C, and E serologic status in urological patients
Închide
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
65 0
SM ISO690:2012
GALESCU, Andrei, SAJIN, Octavian, SPÎNU, Constantin, ISAC, Maria, BLAJ, Valentina, IZIUMOV, Nina, IVANOV (LITOVCENCO), Mihaela, ARIAN, Iurii, CEBAN, Emil. Prevalence of viral hepatitis A, B, C, and E serologic status in urological patients. In: New horizons in urology: The 8th congress on urology, dialysis and kidney transplant from Republic of Moldova with international participation, 7-9 iunie 2023, Chişinău. Chişinău: Taicom (Ridgeone Group), 2023, p. 388. ISSN 2558-815X.
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
New horizons in urology 2023
Conferința "New horizons in urology"
Chişinău, Moldova, 7-9 iunie 2023

Prevalence of viral hepatitis A, B, C, and E serologic status in urological patients


Pag. 388-388

Galescu Andrei12, Sajin Octavian3, Spînu Constantin3, Isac Maria3, Blaj Valentina3, Iziumov Nina3, Ivanov (Litovcenco) Mihaela12, Arian Iurii2, Ceban Emil2
 
1 Timofei Moșneaga Republican Clinical Hospital,
2 ”Nicolae Testemițanu” State University of Medicine and Pharmacy,
3 National Agency for Public Health
 
 
Disponibil în IBN: 28 martie 2024


Rezumat

Objectives. To determine the seroprevalence level of viral hepatitis markers A, B, C, and E in patients from the urology department of the Republican Clinical Hospital. Material and methods. A crosssectional descriptive epidemiological study was conducted. Blood samples were collected from patients in the urology department of the Clinical Emergency Hospital (SCR) and examined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the following viral hepatitis markers: anti-HAV, anti-HAV IgM, AgHBs, anti-HBcor, anti-HBs, anti-HCV, anti-HEV IgG and anti-HEV IgM. A total of 234 patients were examined, and 1638 laboratory tests were performed. Results. The following seroprevalence levels of viral hepatitis markers were identified among patients in the urology department of SCR: AgHBs – 9.0±1.9%; anti-HBcor –47.9±3.3%; anti-HBs – 41.0±3.2%; anti-HCV – 7.7±1.7%; anti-HAV – 95.3±1.4%; anti-HAV IgM – 0%; anti-HEV IgG – 17.5±2.5%; anti-HEV IgM – 27.4±2.9%. The most affected groups for hepatitis B and C were females from the central region of the country, while for hepatitis E, males from the northern region were the most affected. Conclusions. The results indicate that urological patients can be considered a group at increased risk of infection with hepatitis B, C, and E viruses.