Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
147 0 |
Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
617.753.2:615.8-036-053.2 (1) |
Științe medicale. Medicină (11469) |
Fizioterapie. Terapie fizică. Radioterapie. Alte tratamente terapeutice non-medicamentoase (299) |
SM ISO690:2012 BÎLBA, Rodica, LACUSTA, Victor, DUMBRĂVEANU, Lilia, CUSHNIR, V., CHIRIAC, Vera, CURCA, Stelian, COŞULA, Cristina, SPOIALA, Errica. The difference between the influence of physiotherapy and orthokeratology on spherical equivalent and antero-posterior axis growth in children aged 7-16 years. In: Myopia Day, 12-13 octombrie 2023, Chişinău. Chişinău: ”ARVA COLOR”, 2023, p. 29. ISBN 978-9975-127-87-5. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Myopia Day 2023 | ||||||
Conferința "Myopia Day" Chişinău, Moldova, 12-13 octombrie 2023 | ||||||
|
||||||
CZU: 617.753.2:615.8-036-053.2 | ||||||
Pag. 29-29 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
Contemporary myopia progression diagnosis is based on the values of spherical equivalent and antero-posterior axis growth. Physiotherapy and refractive therapy are two methods used to prevent further progression of this eye condition. Aim: to evaluate the difference between the influence of physiotherapy and refractive therapy on spherical equivalent (SE) and antero-posterior axis (APA) growth in children aged 7-16 years during a period of 36 months. Method: Clinical prospective study, that included 80 eyes in children aged 7-16 years with mild or moderate progressive myopia (mean -2,50 ± 2,24 D), 50% of which were treated with physiotherapy, 50% - which applied refractive therapy. Results: In children with mild myopia, after three years of physiotherapy, SE value increased by 1.4 times (from -1.54 ± 0.08 D up to -2.08 ± 0.13 D; p < 0.001). After 3 years of refractive therapy, SE value increased by 1.1 times (from -1.47 ± 0.08 D up to -1.68 ± 0.13 D; p > 0.05). The differences between both groups were statistically reliable (p < 0.001). In children with moderate myopia, after three years of physiotherapy, SE value increased by 1.3 times (from -3.75 ± 0.21 D up to -4.71 ± 0.26 D; p < 0.001) compared to therapy refractive, where SE increased by 1.1 times (from -3.8 ± 0.21 D up to -4.3 ± 0.26 D; p < 0.05). The differences between the data from both groups were statistically reliable (p < 0.001). In children with mild myopia, after three years of physiotherapy treatment, AAP value increased from 24.0 ± 0.08 mm up to 24.24 ± 0.13 mm (p < 0.05) compared with refractive therapy, where the same index increased from 23.92 ± 0.08 mm up to 24.0 ± 0.13 mm (p > 0.05). The differences between groups are statistically reliable (p < 0.01). In children with moderate myopia, after three years of physiotherapy, AAP value increased from 24.7 ± 0.21 mm up to 25.08 ± 0.26 mm (p < 0.05). In patients who applied refractive therapy, AAP value increased from 24.74 ± 0.21 mm up to 25.04 ± 0.26 mm (p > 0.05). The differences between groups are statistically reliable (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Both, physiotherapy and refractive therapy stop the progression of myopia in children aged 7-16 years, but the refractive therapy shows statistically better results in comparison (p < 0.001). |
||||||
|