Dynamics of the training means in the preparatory period of junior weightlifters III (aged 9 to 12)
Închide
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
74 0
Căutarea după subiecte
similare conform CZU
37.02:796.88 (2)
Probleme generale de didactică și metodică (1212)
Divertisment. Jocuri. Sport (1700)
SM ISO690:2012
ULĂREANU, Marius-Viorel, POTOP, Vladimir, STĂNESCU, Marius, CHERNOZUB, Andrei, JURAT, Valeriu. Dynamics of the training means in the preparatory period of junior weightlifters III (aged 9 to 12). In: Actualities and Perspectives of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Ed. 3, 6 aprilie 2022, București. București, România: PRINTECH, 2022, Ediția 3, pp. 91-101. ISSN L 2734-8512.
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
Actualities and Perspectives of Physical Education and Sport Sciences
Ediția 3, 2022
Conferința "Actualities and Perspectives of Physical Education and Sport Sciences"
3, București, Romania, 6 aprilie 2022

Dynamics of the training means in the preparatory period of junior weightlifters III (aged 9 to 12)

CZU: 37.02:796.88

Pag. 91-101

Ulăreanu Marius-Viorel1, Potop Vladimir12, Stănescu Marius3, Chernozub Andrei3, Jurat Valeriu2
 
1 Ecological University of Bucharest,
2 State University of Physical Education and Sport,
3 Petro Mohyla Black Sea National University
 
 
Disponibil în IBN: 14 martie 2024


Rezumat

The purpose of the paper is to highlight the dynamics of the training means throughout the general preparatory period of junior weightlifters III (9-12 years old). In this regard, a study of case was organized in “Rapid” Sports Club of Bucharest, Weightlifting Department. The study was conducted over a period of 3 months (from January to March 2021) corresponding to the general preparatory period. The subject of the study was one 12-year-old athlete, with a training experience of 6 months, who has not participated in competitions so far. The means of technical and power training (front and back squats, pulls, snatch, clean and jerk, bent over rows) were planned and monitored along the 12 micro-cycles (MiC) of training. The duration of the training sessions was 120 minutes. The results of the study reveal the following values: in MiC 4 the share of the technical training is 30% (116 reps) and the share of the power training is 70% (284 reps); in MiC 8 – 35% technique (175 reps) and 65 % power (325 reps); in MiC 12 – 40% technique (240 reps) and 60% power (360 reps). Regarding the means of technique, in the MiC-s 4 and 8 there were used 60% technical means for snatch and clean & jerk and 40% for snatch and clean & jerk without split; the MiC 12 had a share of 70% for technical snatch and clean & jerk and 30% for snatch and clean & jerk without split. As for the means of power, the MiC-s 4 and 8 used 50% front and back squats, 40% pulls in snatch and clean & jerk and 10% bent over rows; the MiC 12 used 60% front and back squats, 30% pulls in snatch and clean & jerk and 10% bent over rows. Therefore, we can draw the conclusion that an optimal relationship between the technical training means and the power training means during the general preparatory period of Junior III weightlifters (9-12 years old) contributes to the increase of muscle strength and the improvement of the technical performance.

Cuvinte-cheie
monitoring and planning, training, weightlifting, training MiC, technical training, power training