Audit of radiology reports of patients with neoplasms performed on computed tomography
Închide
Conţinutul numărului revistei
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
239 6
Ultima descărcare din IBN:
2024-04-10 14:19
Căutarea după subiecte
similare conform CZU
616-006-073.756.8 (1)
Patologie. Medicină clinică (6988)
SM ISO690:2012
STAVER, Natalia, CODREANU, Ion. Audit of radiology reports of patients with neoplasms performed on computed tomography. In: Moldovan Medical Journal, 2022, nr. 1(65), pp. 10-15. ISSN 2537-6373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52418/moldovan-med-j.65-1.22.02
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
Moldovan Medical Journal
Numărul 1(65) / 2022 / ISSN 2537-6373 /ISSNe 2537-6381

Audit of radiology reports of patients with neoplasms performed on computed tomography

DOI:https://doi.org/10.52418/moldovan-med-j.65-1.22.02
CZU: 616-006-073.756.8

Pag. 10-15

Staver Natalia, Codreanu Ion
 
”Nicolae Testemițanu” State University of Medicine and Pharmacy
 
 
Disponibil în IBN: 29 august 2022


Rezumat

Background: Evaluation of the peculiarities of radiology reports of patients with neoplasms of the abdomen and pelvis to optimize clinical imaging management. Material and methods: The study included 104 patients, divided into two groups, experimental group (L2) and control group (L1), repeatedly investigated by computed tomography in 2009-2019, a total of 440 examinations, of which 120 prospective examinations and 320 retrospective examinations, aged between 25 and 85 years, with primary tumors of the abdomen and pelvis. Results: Four specific descriptive criteria were analyzed from radiology reports and were obtained the following results: specification of the scanning protocols in radiology reports (0% for L1 and 95.3% for L2), specifying the reason for the examination in radiology reports (100% for L1 and 26.0% for L2), use of international terminology in radiology reports (0% for L1 and 74% for L2), patient follow-up in radiology reports (88.5% for L1 and 59.8 % for L2). Conclusions: Following the SWOT analysis of the radiology reports, has been developed a standardized model for describing CT images of patients with oncological pathologies of the abdomen and pelvis. The decision-making process was built on Strengths, eliminating Weaknesses, exploiting Opportunities and removing Threats

Cuvinte-cheie
computed tomography, oncology, radiology report, imaging management, follow-up

Dublin Core Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/' xmlns:oai_dc='http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/' xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' xsi:schemaLocation='http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd'>
<dc:creator>Staver, N.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Codreanu, I.</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2022-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:description xml:lang='en'><p>Background: Evaluation of the peculiarities of radiology reports of patients with neoplasms of the abdomen and pelvis to optimize clinical imaging management. Material and methods: The study included 104 patients, divided into two groups, experimental group (L2) and control group (L1), repeatedly investigated by computed tomography in 2009-2019, a total of 440 examinations, of which 120 prospective examinations and 320 retrospective examinations, aged between 25 and 85 years, with primary tumors of the abdomen and pelvis. Results: Four specific descriptive criteria were analyzed from radiology reports and were obtained the following results: specification of the scanning protocols in radiology reports (0% for L1 and 95.3% for L2), specifying the reason for the examination in radiology reports (100% for L1 and 26.0% for L2), use of international terminology in radiology reports (0% for L1 and 74% for L2), patient follow-up in radiology reports (88.5% for L1 and 59.8 % for L2). Conclusions: Following the SWOT analysis of the radiology reports, has been developed a standardized model for describing CT images of patients with oncological pathologies of the abdomen and pelvis. The decision-making process was built on Strengths, eliminating Weaknesses, exploiting Opportunities and removing Threats</p></dc:description>
<dc:identifier>10.52418/moldovan-med-j.65-1.22.02</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>Moldovan Medical Journal 65 (1) 10-15</dc:source>
<dc:subject>computed tomography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>oncology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>radiology report</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>imaging management</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>follow-up</dc:subject>
<dc:title>Audit of radiology reports of patients with neoplasms performed on computed tomography</dc:title>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>