The article shows that skepticism / meta fueling skepticism variability and rationality advance in organization and management. Ideas, in extensive contextual, is returning from work Gaf-Deac, I .. - Fundamentals of management doxastic (Free Mind Publisher, Bucharest, 2013), stated that any development is characterized by a procedural argument evolutionary argument is accompanied by a meta -regresiei. It shows that between "reliable" and "standard" quasi-finished manifests elements of justification which, in turn, assembled induce quasi-image consistency. Managers usually do not accept skepticism. They do not take decisions dominated by skepticism in organization and management. It is true that in a context of global sceptismului managers can isolate areas that are subject of formal-scepticizării configurations using modeling what arguments informal metaskepticism, using doxastica management. It is expected that the visions of the design above trust decision to be involved in supporting effect. Thus, managers will not consider global skepticism that confidence can be justified epistemologically. In contrast, skepticism managers meta-makers will not consider that the standards may be evidence; epistemological justification of standards means "distrust".