Democracy and the covid-19 pandemic. A cross-country perspective within cultural context
Închide
Conţinutul numărului revistei
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
559 35
Ultima descărcare din IBN:
2024-04-22 07:54
SM ISO690:2012
ACHIM, Monica-Violeta, VĂIDEAN, Viorela Ligia, BORLEA, Sorin-Nicolae, FLORESCU, Decebal Remus, MUNTEAN (SLOBODEANU), Neli. Democracy and the covid-19 pandemic. A cross-country perspective within cultural context. In: International Journal of Business and Society, 2021, nr. 2(22), pp. 546-573. ISSN 1511-6670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.3734.2021
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
International Journal of Business and Society
Numărul 2(22) / 2021 / ISSN 1511-6670

Democracy and the covid-19 pandemic. A cross-country perspective within cultural context

DOI:https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.3734.2021

Pag. 546-573

Achim Monica-Violeta1, Văidean Viorela Ligia1, Borlea Sorin-Nicolae123, Florescu Decebal Remus1, Muntean (Slobodeanu) Neli4
 
1 Babeș-Bolyai University,
2 University of Oradea,
3 “Vasile Goldis” Western University of Arad,
4 Technical University of Moldova
 
 
Disponibil în IBN: 2 noiembrie 2021


Rezumat

Our paper investigates the influence of democracy upon the spread of COVID-19. For the purpose of our study we use a sample consisting of 185 worldwide countries affected by the spread of the new coronavirus disease (54 high income and 131 low income countries). First, we find that in high income countries, higher levels of democracy reduce the spread of COVID-19 while in the low income countries its influence is exactly the opposite. Second, we find clear evidence that three dimensions of culture (individualism versus collectivism, uncertainty avoidance and masculinity versus femininity) influence people’s behaviour in relation with the spread of COVID-19 in a large manner. This study’s addressability is wide, from regular people to top policymakers, through their common goal of limiting this pandemic and all the negative effects it brings along. Our findings are important as their policy implications suggest that democracies perform badly for the poorest people and what can be done to improve their record.