<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<resource xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' xmlns='http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3' xsi:schemaLocation='http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-3/metadata.xsd'>
<creators>
<creator>
<creatorName>Sîmbotin, D.</creatorName>
</creator>
</creators>
<titles>
<title xml:lang='ro'>Posibilităţile de reprezentare matricială a ştiinţei
</title>
</titles>
<publisher>Instrumentul Bibliometric National</publisher>
<publicationYear>2009</publicationYear>
<relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType='ISSN' relationType='IsPartOf'>1957-2294</relatedIdentifier>
<dates>
<date dateType='Issued'>2009-04-06</date>
</dates>
<resourceType resourceTypeGeneral='Text'>Journal article</resourceType>
<descriptions>
<description xml:lang='en' descriptionType='Abstract'>The theory of Thomas Khun describes the science like imagines of the world that
there are into continuous transformation, but into a unitary vision. This theory is the start
point for the interpretation of the science representation that it shows in this paper. We
consider every scientific paradigm like imagine of world, sum of independent imagines
developed by theories and scientific laws. In this context we develop a new method of
represent the scientific method using a matrix. We call this, matrix of imagine, and it is
composed by independent imagines whose was in interrelation conform Gestald
principle. Because science is considering in unity, it can be present like a two-
dimensional matrix.
Every science has a two-dimensional matrix correspondent for her paradigm.
This kind of representation is typical for the first years of modernity, when the science
was a mathesis universalis, but in contemporary when every science has herself
paradigm the representation can be change. In the vision of trans-curricular unity the
matrix is three-dimensional and the relationship between all imagines is necessary to
respect the Gestald principle too. In conclusion, the possibilities of representing unity of
science theories are different: for reductionism, the representation is two-dimensional,
and for trans-disciplinarity is three-dimensional.
</description>
</descriptions>
<formats>
<format>application/pdf</format>
</formats>
</resource>