Evoluţia reglementării conflictului transnistrean în anii 1992-2009
Închide
Conţinutul numărului revistei
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
1076 67
Ultima descărcare din IBN:
2024-03-17 16:01
SM ISO690:2012
STĂVILA, Ion. Evoluţia reglementării conflictului transnistrean în anii 1992-2009. In: Revista de Filosofie, Sociologie şi Ştiinţe Politice, 2009, nr. 2(150), pp. 74-96. ISSN 1957-2294.
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
Revista de Filosofie, Sociologie şi Ştiinţe Politice
Numărul 2(150) / 2009 / ISSN 1957-2294

Evoluţia reglementării conflictului transnistrean în anii 1992-2009

Pag. 74-96

Stăvila Ion
 
 
Disponibil în IBN: 16 decembrie 2013


Rezumat

The present article carries out a thorough analysis of the Transnistrian conflict settlement process from its origins to the present situation. That process is conventionally divided into two stages: 1992-2001 and 2001-2009. The succession to power of various political groups and the qualitative changes in the approaches to the ways and means of settling the conflict are proposed as criteria for making such a division. Several different conceptions are scrupulously analyzed with the aim to uncover the main paradigms of the Transnistrian conflict settlement: the Report No. 13 of the CSCE/OSCE Mission to Moldova (1993), the “Moscow Memorandum” (also called the “Primakov Memorandum”) (1997), the “Kozak Memorandum” (2003), the “Yushchenko Plan” (2005), the “package” settlement plan, etc. The inefficiency of the negotiation mechanisms and the lack of progress in the Transnistrian conflict settlement process is explained by its preeminently geopolitical nature and the deep divergences among the stakeholders with regards to the basic principles of the future status of Transnistria. While Chisinau is consistently pleading for a settlement of the conflict based on the principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity of Moldova, Tiraspol opts in favor of the recognition of Transnistria as an independent state entity. The research has been made with the use of relevant documents and materials, produced within the Transnistrian conflict settlement process, and also the personal experience acquired by the author in his professional career.