Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
322 4 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2023-03-29 19:42 |
Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
347.91 (199) |
Procedură legală. Personal judiciar şi organizare judiciară (946) |
SM ISO690:2012 CRUGLIŢCHI, Tatiana. Reguli privind probațiunea în procesul civil. In: Relevanța și calitatea formării universitare: compentențe pentru prezent și viitor, 9 octombrie 2020, Bălți. Bălți: Universitatea de Stat „Alecu Russo" din Bălţi, 2020, Volumul II, pp. 236-241. ISBN 978-9975-50-256-6. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Relevanța și calitatea formării universitare: compentențe pentru prezent și viitor Volumul II, 2020 |
||||||
Conferința "Relevanța și calitatea formării iniversitare: competențe pentru prezent și viitor" Bălți, Moldova, 9 octombrie 2020 | ||||||
|
||||||
CZU: 347.91 | ||||||
Pag. 236-241 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
The Code of Civil Procedure as a framework law of the civil process enshrines the concrete ways of defending / realizing the patrimonial and non-patrimonial civil rights violated or contested. At the current stage of evolution of the Civil and Civil Procedural Normative System, it has undergone a series of substantive changes, being brought essential changes to both the Material Law and the Procedural Rules. With the entry into force of the new amendments to the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, which significantly reformed the stage of preparation of the case for judicial debates and brought a series of clarifications in relation to the stage of court debates, in the practice of national courts, in within the Civil Procedure, a number of difficulties were identified in the application of the new rules, such as the admissibility of evidence, the administration of new evidence submitted, omitting the stage of preparation for judicial debates. Based on the fact that the existence of a correct and uniform judicial practice represents benefits both for the activity of the courts and for the litigants, the conduct of research in relation to the identified problems represents current priorities for action. |
||||||
Cuvinte-cheie the civil process, judicial debates, admissibility of evidence, the administration of new evidence |
||||||
|