Conţinutul numărului revistei |
Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
959 15 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2024-01-24 13:25 |
SM ISO690:2012 ŞOMICU (BANU), Marcela, MARIŢ, Alexandru. Corelaţia conceptelor de responsabilitate
şi iresponsabilitate penală
. In: Analele Ştiinţifice ale Academiei de Studii Economice din Moldova, 2013, nr. 11(2), pp. 66-70. ISSN 1857-1433. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Analele Ştiinţifice ale Academiei de Studii Economice din Moldova | ||||||
Numărul 11(2) / 2013 / ISSN 1857-1433 | ||||||
|
||||||
Pag. 66-70 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
As mentioned above for individual became subject of the offense itself must include general conditions; responsibility age.
The first condition that must make it a natural for the crime topic is responsibility. Penal Code does not define the notion of responsibility because it is the normal condition of the person, but it is clear from the legislation contained in art. 23 of CP., Which provided: not form criminal offense under the criminal law if committed by an irresponsible person, provided also flows from the essential feature of guilt, without which no offense and that necessarily involves responsibility person, because only one person responsible may act guilty, may provide the consequences of its occurrence, to which adopt a certain attitude, to watch, to accept or to believe that will not happen. Responsibility can be defined as psychophysical condition of the person who has the ability to understand the nature of his actions, to realize the value and their consequences, and the ability to lead and will normally conduct in relation to shares. |
||||||
|