Conţinutul numărului revistei |
Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
721 17 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2024-06-18 02:19 |
Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
341.1.01 (6) |
Dreptul organizațiilor internaționale (277) |
SM ISO690:2012 BOYKO, Inna. Judicial law-making as a function of the International Court of Justice. In: Legea şi Viaţa, 2018, nr. 8/2(320), pp. 3-6. ISSN 2587-4365. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Legea şi Viaţa | ||||||
Numărul 8/2(320) / 2018 / ISSN 2587-4365 /ISSNe 2587-4373 | ||||||
|
||||||
CZU: 341.1.01 | ||||||
Pag. 3-6 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
This article deals with a theoretical and practical problem of recognizing judicial precedent as a formal source of international law. The author proves that the legislation of international justice bodies, in particular the UN International Court of Justice, are not only closely connected with law application, but also have independent significance. It is established that the importance of judicial legislation by international judicial institutions and its results are difficult to overemphasize, as from “auxiliary means of determining legal norms” judicial decisions have evolved into an effective tool for resolving international disputes improving the quality of international law. The results of judicial legislation are acts-regulations; case-law decisions; and rules of international instruments (Convention on the Territorial Sea and the Contiguous Zone 1958 and UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982). |
||||||
Cuvinte-cheie judicial legislation, maritime delimitation., judicial precedent, the International Court of Justice, international public law |
||||||
|
Cerif XML Export
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?> <CERIF xmlns='urn:xmlns:org:eurocris:cerif-1.5-1' xsi:schemaLocation='urn:xmlns:org:eurocris:cerif-1.5-1 http://www.eurocris.org/Uploads/Web%20pages/CERIF-1.5/CERIF_1.5_1.xsd' xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' release='1.5' date='2012-10-07' sourceDatabase='Output Profile'> <cfResPubl> <cfResPublId>ibn-ResPubl-65332</cfResPublId> <cfResPublDate>2018-08-25</cfResPublDate> <cfVol>320</cfVol> <cfIssue>8/2</cfIssue> <cfStartPage>3</cfStartPage> <cfISSN>2587-4365</cfISSN> <cfURI>https://ibn.idsi.md/ro/vizualizare_articol/65332</cfURI> <cfTitle cfLangCode='EN' cfTrans='o'>Judicial law-making as a function of the International Court of Justice</cfTitle> <cfKeyw cfLangCode='EN' cfTrans='o'>judicial legislation; judicial precedent; the International Court of Justice; international public law; maritime delimitation.</cfKeyw> <cfAbstr cfLangCode='EN' cfTrans='o'><p>This article deals with a theoretical and practical problem of recognizing judicial precedent as a formal source of international law. The author proves that the legislation of international justice bodies, in particular the UN International Court of Justice, are not only closely connected with law application, but also have independent significance. It is established that the importance of judicial legislation by international judicial institutions and its results are difficult to overemphasize, as from “auxiliary means of determining legal norms” judicial decisions have evolved into an effective tool for resolving international disputes improving the quality of international law. The results of judicial legislation are acts-regulations; case-law decisions; and rules of international instruments (Convention on the Territorial Sea and the Contiguous Zone 1958 and UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982).</p></cfAbstr> <cfAbstr cfLangCode='RU' cfTrans='o'><p>Статья посвящена теоретической и практической проблеме признания судебного прецедента как формального источника международного права. Автором доказано, что правотворчество международных органов правосудия, в частности Международного суда ООН, не только тесно связано с применением права, но и имеет самостоятельное значение. Установлено, что значение судебного правотворчества международных судебных учреждений и ее результатов переоценить трудно, так как от «вспомогательных средств определения правовых норм» судебные решения эволюционировали в эффективный инструментарий разрешения международных споров, качественно совершенствуя международное право. Результаты судебного правотворчества – акты-регламенты, решения прецедентного характера, нормы международных документов (Конвенции о территориальном море и прилегающей зоне 1958 г., Конвенции ООН по морскому праву 1982 г.).</p></cfAbstr> <cfResPubl_Class> <cfClassId>eda2d9e9-34c5-11e1-b86c-0800200c9a66</cfClassId> <cfClassSchemeId>759af938-34ae-11e1-b86c-0800200c9a66</cfClassSchemeId> <cfStartDate>2018-08-25T24:00:00</cfStartDate> </cfResPubl_Class> <cfResPubl_Class> <cfClassId>e601872f-4b7e-4d88-929f-7df027b226c9</cfClassId> <cfClassSchemeId>40e90e2f-446d-460a-98e5-5dce57550c48</cfClassSchemeId> <cfStartDate>2018-08-25T24:00:00</cfStartDate> </cfResPubl_Class> <cfPers_ResPubl> <cfPersId>ibn-person-57993</cfPersId> <cfClassId>49815870-1cfe-11e1-8bc2-0800200c9a66</cfClassId> <cfClassSchemeId>b7135ad0-1d00-11e1-8bc2-0800200c9a66</cfClassSchemeId> <cfStartDate>2018-08-25T24:00:00</cfStartDate> </cfPers_ResPubl> </cfResPubl> <cfPers> <cfPersId>ibn-Pers-57993</cfPersId> <cfPersName_Pers> <cfPersNameId>ibn-PersName-57993-3</cfPersNameId> <cfClassId>55f90543-d631-42eb-8d47-d8d9266cbb26</cfClassId> <cfClassSchemeId>7375609d-cfa6-45ce-a803-75de69abe21f</cfClassSchemeId> <cfStartDate>2018-08-25T24:00:00</cfStartDate> <cfFamilyNames>Boyko</cfFamilyNames> <cfFirstNames>Inna</cfFirstNames> <cfFamilyNames>Бойко</cfFamilyNames> <cfFirstNames>Инна</cfFirstNames> </cfPersName_Pers> </cfPers> </CERIF>