Conţinutul numărului revistei |
Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
706 9 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2020-04-30 01:41 |
Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
347.9(477) (9) |
Procedură legală. Personal judiciar şi organizare judiciară (953) |
SM ISO690:2012 МАСЛОВ, Виктор. Судебный прецедент в Украине: процессуально-правовой аспект. In: Legea şi Viaţa, 2015, nr. 3/2(279), pp. 61-63. ISSN 2587-4365. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Legea şi Viaţa | ||||||
Numărul 3/2(279) / 2015 / ISSN 2587-4365 /ISSNe 2587-4373 | ||||||
|
||||||
CZU: 347.9(477) | ||||||
Pag. 61-63 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
The article is devoted to the exploring of question connect with a place of case-law in the system of procedural law in Ukraine.
Author describes the role of the legal opinions of the Supreme Court of Ukraine, as well as their impact on the fixity of judicial
decisions and speed of their adoption. He also researches the mechanism of acceptance and decision-making, which later can be
classified as a basic of the practice of case law. Article involves the descriptions of Roman-Germanic and Anglo-Saxon doctrines,
prevailing in the world, by pointing out their positive and negative traits, highlights the specification of existence of judicial precedent
in such legal families and expediency of their use in the justice of our country. |
||||||
Cuvinte-cheie судебная система, судебный прецедент, судебное решение, материальное и процессуальное право, механизм формирования судебного прецедента |
||||||
|
DataCite XML Export
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?> <resource xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' xmlns='http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3' xsi:schemaLocation='http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-3/metadata.xsd'> <creators> <creator> <creatorName>Maslov, V.</creatorName> <affiliation>Институт законодательства Верховной Рады Украины, Ucraina</affiliation> </creator> </creators> <titles> <title xml:lang='ru'>Судебный прецедент в Украине: процессуально-правовой аспект</title> </titles> <publisher>Instrumentul Bibliometric National</publisher> <publicationYear>2015</publicationYear> <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType='ISSN' relationType='IsPartOf'>2587-4365</relatedIdentifier> <subjects> <subject>судебная система</subject> <subject>судебный прецедент</subject> <subject>материальное и процессуальное право</subject> <subject>механизм формирования судебного прецедента</subject> <subject>судебное решение</subject> <subject schemeURI='http://udcdata.info/' subjectScheme='UDC'>347.9(477)</subject> </subjects> <dates> <date dateType='Issued'>2015-03-03</date> </dates> <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral='Text'>Journal article</resourceType> <descriptions> <description xml:lang='en' descriptionType='Abstract'>The article is devoted to the exploring of question connect with a place of case-law in the system of procedural law in Ukraine. Author describes the role of the legal opinions of the Supreme Court of Ukraine, as well as their impact on the fixity of judicial decisions and speed of their adoption. He also researches the mechanism of acceptance and decision-making, which later can be classified as a basic of the practice of case law. Article involves the descriptions of Roman-Germanic and Anglo-Saxon doctrines, prevailing in the world, by pointing out their positive and negative traits, highlights the specification of existence of judicial precedent in such legal families and expediency of their use in the justice of our country.</description> <description xml:lang='ru' descriptionType='Abstract'>Статья посвящена исследованию вопроса места прецедентного права в системе процессуального права Украины. Рассматривается роль правовых позиций Верховного Суда Украины, а также их влияние на стабильность судебных решений и оперативность их принятия. Исследуется механизм принятия решений, которые в дальнейшем могут квалифицироваться как основа практики прецедентного права. На примере романогерманской и англосаксонской доктрин, сложившихся в мире, мы, указывая на их положительные и отрицательные черты, подчеркиваем особенности существования судебного прецедента в таких правовых семьях и отмечаем целесообразность их применения в правосудии нашей страны.</description> </descriptions> <formats> <format>application/pdf</format> </formats> </resource>