Conţinutul numărului revistei |
Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
886 12 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2024-04-14 15:02 |
SM ISO690:2012 ЩЁКИН, Юрий. Международно-правовой обычай как источник права англии. In: Legea şi Viaţa, 2013, nr. 12/4(264), pp. 204-208. ISSN 2587-4365. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Legea şi Viaţa | ||||||
Numărul 12/4(264) / 2013 / ISSN 2587-4365 /ISSNe 2587-4373 | ||||||
|
||||||
Pag. 204-208 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
The article is devoted to the research of theory and practice of application of international law customs in England law system.
It has been studied the usage of the incorporation and transformation doctrines in the English courts practice on the examples of the main cases, dealt with establishment, interpretation and application of international law customs: Buvot v. Barbuit (1737), Triquet v. Bath (1764), Queen v. Keyn (1876), West Rand Central Gold Mining Co., Limited v. R. (1905), Chung Chi Cheung v. The King (1939), Trendtex Trading Corp. v. Central Bank of Nigeria (1977), Maclaine Watson v. Departmant of Trade and Industry (1988) and R. v. Jones and Milling (2006). |
||||||
Cuvinte-cheie международно-правовой обычай, международное обычное право, доктрина инкорпорации, доктрина трансформации, доктрина stare decisis |
||||||
|
Dublin Core Export
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?> <oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/' xmlns:oai_dc='http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/' xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' xsi:schemaLocation='http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd'> <dc:creator>Şciochin, I.</dc:creator> <dc:date>2013-06-04</dc:date> <dc:description xml:lang='en'>The article is devoted to the research of theory and practice of application of international law customs in England law system. It has been studied the usage of the incorporation and transformation doctrines in the English courts practice on the examples of the main cases, dealt with establishment, interpretation and application of international law customs: Buvot v. Barbuit (1737), Triquet v. Bath (1764), Queen v. Keyn (1876), West Rand Central Gold Mining Co., Limited v. R. (1905), Chung Chi Cheung v. The King (1939), Trendtex Trading Corp. v. Central Bank of Nigeria (1977), Maclaine Watson v. Departmant of Trade and Industry (1988) and R. v. Jones and Milling (2006).</dc:description> <dc:description xml:lang='ru'>В статье проводится исследование истории теории и практики применения международно-правовых обычаев во внутреннем праве Англии. Изучено использование доктрин инкорпорации и трансформации в практике судов Англии на примерах основных дел, связанных с установлением, толкованием и применением международно-правовых обычаев: Buvot v. Barbuit(1737 г.), Triquet v. Bath (1764 г.), Queen v. Keyn (1876 г.), West Rand Central Gold Mining Co., Limited v. R. (1905 г.), Chung Chi Cheung v. The King (1939 г.), Trendtex Trading Corp. v. Central Bank of Nigeria (1977 г.), Maclaine Watson v. Departmant of Trade and Industry (1988 г.) и R. v. Jones and Milling (2006 г.).</dc:description> <dc:source>Legea şi Viaţa 264 (12/4) 204-208</dc:source> <dc:subject>международно-правовой обычай</dc:subject> <dc:subject>международное обычное право</dc:subject> <dc:subject>доктрина инкорпорации</dc:subject> <dc:subject>доктрина трансформации</dc:subject> <dc:subject>доктрина stare decisis</dc:subject> <dc:title>Международно-правовой обычай как источник права англии</dc:title> <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type> </oai_dc:dc>