Percutaneous nephrolithotomy. clinical experience for 4 years
Închide
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
56 0
SM ISO690:2012
GALESCU, Andrei, ROTARI, Vladislav, IVANOV (LITOVCENCO), Mihaela, CEBAN, Emil. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy. clinical experience for 4 years. In: New horizons in urology: The 8th congress on urology, dialysis and kidney transplant from Republic of Moldova with international participation, 7-9 iunie 2023, Chişinău. Chişinău: Taicom (Ridgeone Group), 2023, p. 338. ISSN 2558-815X.
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
New horizons in urology 2023
Conferința "New horizons in urology"
Chişinău, Moldova, 7-9 iunie 2023

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy. clinical experience for 4 years


Pag. 338-338

Galescu Andrei12, Rotari Vladislav12, Ivanov (Litovcenco) Mihaela12, Ceban Emil1
 
1 ”Nicolae Testemițanu” State University of Medicine and Pharmacy,
2 Timofei Moșneaga Republican Clinical Hospital
 
 
Disponibil în IBN: 26 martie 2024


Rezumat

Introduction. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a minimally invasive procedure to remove kidney stones by a punction through the skin in lumbar region. This procedure is accepted as standard of care for patients with kidney stones that are large and resistant to other forms of urolithiasis. Objective. Stone free rate obtained in the clinic following PCNL intervention applied to patients with urolithiasis, during 4 years (20192023). Material and methods. The study was performed in the Department of urology and surgical nephrology of the State University of Medicine and Pharmacy «Nicolae Testemițanu», on a group of 175 patients with diagnosis of urolithiasis. Results. Anatomical distribution of renal stones: right kidney 81(46,3%) patients, left kidney 94(53,7%) patients. The stones size ranged from 2 cm up to massive staghorn stones (>4,5cm). The after-surgery hospitalization period on average was 4,5 days. Four patients had solitary kidney. From the group of study, 5 (2,9%) of them were tubeless, 4 (2,3%) were with two puncture channels, and 1 (0,6%) patient was with three puncture channels. The stratification of the surgical after surgery complications was evaluated according to the Clavien-Dindo score. CDS I: 145(82,85%); patients CDS II: 26(14,85%) patients, CDS III: 4 (2,3%) patients. Patients with CDS IV and V were not detected. Conclusions. The success of PCNL is dependent on many factors such as stone composition, stone size, number of stones, localization, body mass index. The stone free rate was 91% and 100% following by “second look” procedure: ESWL, Ureteroscopy.