The Communist governance between 2001-2009 put again the subject of history in the public’s attention. They removed the History of Romanians from school curricula and implementing a new one – History (integrated course). Civil society, in general, and the academic community, in particular, protested against the involvement of politics in history education. Communist government spent more than 12 millions Lei for printing new history textbook, but most of them were criticized by scholars and teachers. The Moldovan history textbooks were in attention of the European Commission against Rasism and Intolerance which recommends to the Government to avoid all racist materials or which encouraging the stereotypes, intolerance and prejudice some of the minority group. The measures taken by the former communist government after the events of April 2009 prove the aggressive attitude towards those who consider themselves Romanians, towards language and history of Romanians. The letters signed by the Prime-ViceMinister, V. Stepaniuc, addressed to the Prime-Minister, Z. Greaceanii, and the President of Moldova, V. Voronin, emphasizes this idea by submitting ―suggestions aimed at fighting Romanian anti-state ideology.‖ The communist government, in those eight years of being in power, attempted to impose the ideology of the Communists’ Party from Moldova as a state ideology, that is against the Constitution of the Republic of Moldova. Intruding of politics into history teaching resulted in appearance of tensions in social life of the country; it corrupted history teaching and contributed to publishing of low-quality textbooks. The recent involvement of the Russians politicians and Russian Ambassador in the Republic of Moldova in debating the questions concerning history teaching and condamning the Moldovan President’s Decree which declare the June 28, 1940 as the day of Soviet occupation is against the independency of Moldova. To maintain the control on Moldovan authorities Russia is using the practices of economic and political blackmail. All of these practices are specific for soviet imperialism policy. The problem of language and national history in Moldova are particular cases and nobody can comprehend them better than the native population. Intrusion of politics in history writing has always resulted in misunderstandings and resentment and has emphasized discrepancy of the existing social problems. Taking this into account, the problems referring to the identity discourse, language, and history have to be approached in a professional climate and in accordance with the principles of academic research excluding any political influence. The excessive involvement of the Moldovan and Russian state authorities in (re)writing the history and appreciation the past has triggered each time major revolts and social movements.