Retention in orthodontics. clinical aspects and methods of implementation
Închide
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
91 3
Ultima descărcare din IBN:
2024-03-21 17:44
SM ISO690:2012
MADAN, Cătălina, AVORNIC-CIUMEICO, Lucia, CALFA, Sabina, TRIFAN, Valentina. Retention in orthodontics. clinical aspects and methods of implementation. In: Perspectives of the Balkan medicine in the post COVID-19 era: The 37th Balkan Medical Week. The 8th congress on urology, dialysis and kidney transplant from the Republic of Moldova “New Horizons in Urology”, Ed. 37, 7-9 iunie 2023, Chişinău. București: Balkan Medical Union, 2023, Ediția 37, p. 55. ISSN Print: ISSN 1584-9244 ISSN-L 1584-9244 Online: ISSN 2558-815X.
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
Perspectives of the Balkan medicine in the post COVID-19 era
Ediția 37, 2023
Congresul "Perspectives of the Balkan medicine in the post COVID-19 era"
37, Chişinău, Moldova, 7-9 iunie 2023

Retention in orthodontics. clinical aspects and methods of implementation


Pag. 55-55

Madan Cătălina, Avornic-Ciumeico Lucia, Calfa Sabina, Trifan Valentina
 
”Nicolae Testemițanu” State University of Medicine and Pharmacy
 
 
Disponibil în IBN: 18 decembrie 2023


Rezumat

Introduction. Retention is necessary for three major reasons: 1) periodontal and gingival tissues are influenced by orthodontic tooth movement and require time for reorganization when the orthodontic appliance is removed; 2) teeth may be in an inherently unstable position after the treatment, so that soft tissue pressure constantly produce a relapse tendency; 3) changes produced by growth may alter the orthodontic treatment result. Material and methods. 12 patients, who were in a period of fixed and mixed contention. Of which fixed contention was applied to 7 patients and mixed contention to 5 patients. The patients were subjected to clinical and paraclinical examination. The patients were subjected to clinical and paraclinical examination: analysis of study models, photographic examination, panoramic radiography, teleradiography. Results. Out of 7 patients who had fixed retention, relapse was observed in 3 patients with detached retainers. Out of 5 patients who had mixed contention, relapse was only detected in one patient because he did not wear the Hawley device, the retainer was detached or the patient did not go to the doctor in time. Other patients are under observation, stable and without changes. Conclusion. In the study we found, how much influence the application of a correct diagnosis and treatment. An advantage of retainers is attributed to the correction of minor dental deviations, thus these devices have the possibility to combine both: prophylactic and curative methods.