<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/' xmlns:oai_dc='http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/' xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' xsi:schemaLocation='http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd'>
<dc:creator>Rudenco, I.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Comanici, I.G.</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-01-04</dc:date>
<dc:description xml:lang='en'>The hypothesis on the falseness origin’ Prunus domestica L. propound by M. Crane and W. Lawrence
was confi rmed by Rîbin [5] doing multiple crossbreeding between Prunus spinosa L. and P. cerasifera Ehrh. This
theory was questioned (was called in question) by the French geneticist G. Sallesses according to exists an absence
in hybrid generations the forms with yellow fruits. The version forwarded by Sallesses gets sustentation in some
publications [1].
In the present article is done the detailed description of the hybrid forms of different ploidy obtained as a result
of the Prunus spinosa L. and P. cerasifera Ehrh. hybridization which bearing yellow fruits: (1) the allotriploid form
(2n=3x=24) obtained from the crossbreeding of Prunus spinosa x P. cerasifera; (2) the allotriploid hybrid (sesquidiploid
2n=4x=32) from (by) self-pollination of allotetraploid hybrid between Prunus spinosa L. and P. cerasifera Ehrh.
“Kostomarov”; (3) the trigenome hexaploids (2n=6x=48) obtained on the base of crossbreeding of Prunus spinosa
L. synthetically re-synthesized with the culture varieties (Prunus spinosa x P. cerasifera) x Prunus domestica. These
hybrids try to refute the version of G. Sallesses.</dc:description>
<dc:source>Revista Botanică 3 (1) 74-79</dc:source>
<dc:title>Contribuţie la susţinerea teoriei privind provenienţa hibridogenă a prunului comun (Prunus domestica L.)</dc:title>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>