Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
239 0 |
SM ISO690:2012 PATRU, Emilian. Concrete ways of conducting national definitivat examination in education. In: Book of Abstracts: "Sports, education, culture - interdisciplinary approaches in scientific research", 26-27 mai 2017, Galaţi. Galați: 2017, Ediția 3, pp. 70-71. ISSN 2457-3094. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Book of Abstracts Ediția 3, 2017 |
||||||
Conferința "International Scientific Conference " Galaţi, Moldova, 26-27 mai 2017 | ||||||
|
||||||
Pag. 70-71 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
In accordance with new methodology for conducting the Definitivat examination ,it applies to all teachers teaching in schools under article 225,paragraph 268,(1), Art. 279 National Education Law no.1/2011, as amended and supplemented. The structure of the examination is as follows: Step I - elimination a specialized support two inspections; professional portfolio assessment; Step II – the final the written examination. The difference from the previous exams is to assess the inspector that performs inspection or the methodologist teacher, the professional portfolio of the candidate.The professional portfolio includes: a) Curriculum Vitae; b) A letter of intention with words (between 200 and 400) showing the motivation for the definitivat examination, objectives and own expectations regarding the personal training as a teacher , self-assessment activities/experience got during the semester, self-esteem professional portfolio and proposals for improvement; c) A progress report school accompanied by the following supporting documents: Planning: annual, quarterly and learning units; Minimum 10 teaching projects for different types of lessons; Assessment tools (a predictive test with corresponding scale, test results actions); The roll of the teacher; Teaching resources adapted to the grade level /group. d) Self professional portfolio ,according to the evaluation grid set out in Annex No.4 personnal is performed according to the evaluation grid set out in Annex 4,on the day the second specialized inspection is done by the commission based on the stipulations of Article 9.(6). Personnal professional portfolio is marked to notes from 1 to 10 .The grade cannot be appealed. |
||||||
Cuvinte-cheie portfolio, self professional, inspection |
||||||
|