Good News vs. Bad News: What are they talking about?
Închide
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
243 3
Ultima descărcare din IBN:
2024-03-27 15:08
SM ISO690:2012
KANISHCHEVA, Olga, BOBICEV, Victoria. Good News vs. Bad News: What are they talking about? In: Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing: RANLP, 2-8 septembrie 2017, Varna. Stroudsburg PA: Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 2017, Ediția 11, pp. 325-333. ISBN 978-954452048-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26615/978-954-452-049-6-044
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing
Ediția 11, 2017
Conferința "11th International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing"
Varna, Bulgaria, 2-8 septembrie 2017

Good News vs. Bad News: What are they talking about?

DOI:https://doi.org/10.26615/978-954-452-049-6-044

Pag. 325-333

Kanishcheva Olga1, Bobicev Victoria2
 
1 National Technical University «Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute»,
2 Technical University of Moldova
 
 
Disponibil în IBN: 4 februarie 2023


Rezumat

Today's massive news streams demand the automate analysis which is provided by various online news explorers. However, most of them do not provide sentiment analysis. The main problem of sentiment analysis of news is the differences between the writers and readers attitudes to the news text. News can be good or bad but have to be delivered in neutral words as pure facts. Although there are applications for sentiment analysis of news, the task of news analysis is still a very actual problem because the latest news impacts people's lives daily. In this paper, we explored the problem of sentiment analysis for Ukrainian and Russian news, developed a corpus of Ukrainian and Russian news and annotated each text using one of three categories: positive, negative and neutral. Each text was marked by at least three independent anno-tators via the web interface, the inter-annotator agreement was analyzed and the final label for each text was computed. These texts were used in the machine learning experiments. Further, we investigated what kinds of named entities such as Locations, Organizations, Persons are perceived as good or bad by the readers and which of them were the cause for text annotation ambiguity.

Cuvinte-cheie
Named entities, Online news, Text annotations, Three categories, Web interface