Assessing and improving children’s rights in hospitals: Case studies from Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Moldova
Închide
Conţinutul numărului revistei
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
183 0
SM ISO690:2012
GUERREIRO, Ana Isabel Fernandes, KUTTUMURATOVA, Aigul, MONOLBAEV, Kubanychbek, BODERSCOVA, Larisa, PIROVA, Zulfiya, WEBER, Martin W.. Assessing and improving children’s rights in hospitals: Case studies from Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Moldova. In: Health and Human Rights, 2016, nr. 1(18), pp. 235-248. ISSN 1079-0969.
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
Health and Human Rights
Numărul 1(18) / 2016 / ISSN 1079-0969 /ISSNe 2150-4113

Assessing and improving children’s rights in hospitals: Case studies from Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Moldova


Pag. 235-248

Guerreiro Ana Isabel Fernandes1, Kuttumuratova Aigul2, Monolbaev Kubanychbek3, Boderscova Larisa4, Pirova Zulfiya5, Weber Martin W.2
 
1 Independent Consultant on Children's Rights, Portugal,
2 WHO Regional Office for Europe,
3 WHO Country Office, Kyrgyzstan,
4 WHO Regional Center Moldova,
5 WHO Country Office Tajikistan, Dushanbe
 
 
Disponibil în IBN: 13 septembrie 2022


Rezumat

There is a recognized need to raise evidence on how to adopt human rights-based approaches (HRBAs) to health and to assess their impact. In 2013 and 2014, the World Health Organization (WHO) Regional Office for Europe used a set of tools to assess and improve the situation of children’s rights in 11 hospitals in Kyrgyzstan, 10 hospitals in Tajikistan, and 21 hospitals in Moldova, by applying a HRBA to health, taking as a reference the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC). The assessment results show a similar situation across countries in some areas, and more or less significant variation in others. Common gaps include the need to improve adolescent-friendly health services, the rights to privacy and play; and infrastructure and equipment. In Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, a second round of assessment, was carried out, which showed an effective change in several areas, whilst other areas showed persistent gaps. Moldova did not carry out a second round of assessment. Involving children and parents in the assessment was crucial to obtain more reliable data; the project showed how to use the CRC as a framework to improve quality of care for children (QoC); and the tools were proven useful for self-assessment.