Conţinutul numărului revistei |
Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
880 2 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2016-04-13 15:41 |
Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
347.77.028 (3) |
Drept comercial. Dreptul societăţilor comerciale (1293) |
SM ISO690:2012 BAZARENCO, Tatiana. Temeiurile pentru solicitarea materialelor suplimentare la examinarea invenţiei. In: Intellectus, 2003, nr. 1, pp. 20-25. ISSN 1810-7079. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Intellectus | ||||||
Numărul 1 / 2003 / ISSN 1810-7079 /ISSNe 1810-7087 | ||||||
|
||||||
CZU: 347.77.028 | ||||||
Pag. 20-25 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
A t the preliminary examination stage the notifications are sent in the following cases: missing in
the application of at least one document specified in the Regulations on the Application of the
Law on Patents for Invention No. 461/1995; missing of the authorization proving the representation;
revealing of certain defects in the document drafting; incorrectness in the payment of fees; lack in the
description of structural chapters thereof; lack in the claim of the subject-matter for which protection
is sought; non-compliance with the requirement of unity of invention; presence of a dependent claim,
assuming exclusion or change of a feature (s) from the claim to which it is subordinated; the claimed
invention represents variants of solution of the same aim, but it is not traced one common aim; use in
the description of commonly unaccepted terminology etc.
At the substantive examination stage grounds for notification may be the following circumstances:
missing in the claim of an essential feature, in the absence of which it cannot be attained the technical
result; presence in the claim of a nonessential feature, characterizing only partial forms of realization
or utilization of the invention; impossibility of identifying the feature of the claim; claiming of a
group of inventions; lack of unity of invention; non-compliance with the established requirements of
the claim structure or of the summary thereof. |
||||||
|
DataCite XML Export
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?> <resource xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' xmlns='http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3' xsi:schemaLocation='http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-3/metadata.xsd'> <creators> <creator> <creatorName>Bazarenco, T.</creatorName> <affiliation>Agentia de Stat pentru Proprietatea Intelectuala a Republicii Moldova (AGEPI), Moldova, Republica</affiliation> </creator> </creators> <titles> <title xml:lang='ro'>Temeiurile pentru solicitarea materialelor suplimentare la examinarea invenţiei</title> </titles> <publisher>Instrumentul Bibliometric National</publisher> <publicationYear>2003</publicationYear> <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType='ISSN' relationType='IsPartOf'>1810-7079</relatedIdentifier> <subjects> <subject schemeURI='http://udcdata.info/' subjectScheme='UDC'>347.77.028</subject> </subjects> <dates> <date dateType='Issued'>2003-02-03</date> </dates> <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral='Text'>Journal article</resourceType> <descriptions> <description xml:lang='en' descriptionType='Abstract'>A t the preliminary examination stage the notifications are sent in the following cases: missing in the application of at least one document specified in the Regulations on the Application of the Law on Patents for Invention No. 461/1995; missing of the authorization proving the representation; revealing of certain defects in the document drafting; incorrectness in the payment of fees; lack in the description of structural chapters thereof; lack in the claim of the subject-matter for which protection is sought; non-compliance with the requirement of unity of invention; presence of a dependent claim, assuming exclusion or change of a feature (s) from the claim to which it is subordinated; the claimed invention represents variants of solution of the same aim, but it is not traced one common aim; use in the description of commonly unaccepted terminology etc. At the substantive examination stage grounds for notification may be the following circumstances: missing in the claim of an essential feature, in the absence of which it cannot be attained the technical result; presence in the claim of a nonessential feature, characterizing only partial forms of realization or utilization of the invention; impossibility of identifying the feature of the claim; claiming of a group of inventions; lack of unity of invention; non-compliance with the established requirements of the claim structure or of the summary thereof.</description> </descriptions> <formats> <format>application/pdf</format> </formats> </resource>