Temeiurile pentru solicitarea materialelor suplimentare la examinarea invenţiei
Închide
Conţinutul numărului revistei
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
880 2
Ultima descărcare din IBN:
2016-04-13 15:41
Căutarea după subiecte
similare conform CZU
347.77.028 (3)
Drept comercial. Dreptul societăţilor comerciale (1293)
SM ISO690:2012
BAZARENCO, Tatiana. Temeiurile pentru solicitarea materialelor suplimentare la examinarea invenţiei. In: Intellectus, 2003, nr. 1, pp. 20-25. ISSN 1810-7079.
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
Intellectus
Numărul 1 / 2003 / ISSN 1810-7079 /ISSNe 1810-7087

Temeiurile pentru solicitarea materialelor suplimentare la examinarea invenţiei
CZU: 347.77.028

Pag. 20-25

Bazarenco Tatiana
 
Agentia de Stat pentru Proprietatea Intelectuala a Republicii Moldova (AGEPI)
 
 
Disponibil în IBN: 30 noiembrie 2013


Rezumat

A t the preliminary examination stage the notifications are sent in the following cases: missing in the application of at least one document specified in the Regulations on the Application of the Law on Patents for Invention No. 461/1995; missing of the authorization proving the representation; revealing of certain defects in the document drafting; incorrectness in the payment of fees; lack in the description of structural chapters thereof; lack in the claim of the subject-matter for which protection is sought; non-compliance with the requirement of unity of invention; presence of a dependent claim, assuming exclusion or change of a feature (s) from the claim to which it is subordinated; the claimed invention represents variants of solution of the same aim, but it is not traced one common aim; use in the description of commonly unaccepted terminology etc. At the substantive examination stage grounds for notification may be the following circumstances: missing in the claim of an essential feature, in the absence of which it cannot be attained the technical result; presence in the claim of a nonessential feature, characterizing only partial forms of realization or utilization of the invention; impossibility of identifying the feature of the claim; claiming of a group of inventions; lack of unity of invention; non-compliance with the established requirements of the claim structure or of the summary thereof.

DataCite XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<resource xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' xmlns='http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3' xsi:schemaLocation='http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-3/metadata.xsd'>
<creators>
<creator>
<creatorName>Bazarenco, T.</creatorName>
<affiliation>Agentia de Stat pentru Proprietatea Intelectuala a Republicii Moldova (AGEPI), Moldova, Republica</affiliation>
</creator>
</creators>
<titles>
<title xml:lang='ro'>Temeiurile pentru solicitarea materialelor suplimentare la examinarea invenţiei</title>
</titles>
<publisher>Instrumentul Bibliometric National</publisher>
<publicationYear>2003</publicationYear>
<relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType='ISSN' relationType='IsPartOf'>1810-7079</relatedIdentifier>
<subjects>
<subject schemeURI='http://udcdata.info/' subjectScheme='UDC'>347.77.028</subject>
</subjects>
<dates>
<date dateType='Issued'>2003-02-03</date>
</dates>
<resourceType resourceTypeGeneral='Text'>Journal article</resourceType>
<descriptions>
<description xml:lang='en' descriptionType='Abstract'>A t the preliminary examination stage the notifications are sent in the following cases: missing in
the application of at least one document specified in the Regulations on the Application of the
Law on Patents for Invention No. 461/1995; missing of the authorization proving the representation;
revealing of certain defects in the document drafting; incorrectness in the payment of fees; lack in the
description of structural chapters thereof; lack in the claim of the subject-matter for which protection
is sought; non-compliance with the requirement of unity of invention; presence of a dependent claim,
assuming exclusion or change of a feature (s) from the claim to which it is subordinated; the claimed
invention represents variants of solution of the same aim, but it is not traced one common aim; use in
the description of commonly unaccepted terminology etc.
At the substantive examination stage grounds for notification may be the following circumstances:
missing in the claim of an essential feature, in the absence of which it cannot be attained the technical
result; presence in the claim of a nonessential feature, characterizing only partial forms of realization
or utilization of the invention; impossibility of identifying the feature of the claim; claiming of a
group of inventions; lack of unity of invention; non-compliance with the established requirements of
the claim structure or of the summary thereof.</description>
</descriptions>
<formats>
<format>application/pdf</format>
</formats>
</resource>