Conţinutul numărului revistei |
Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
303 7 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2024-02-09 17:24 |
Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
347.1 (243) |
Generalități în dreptul civil (238) |
SM ISO690:2012 RUSU, Ion. Arhitectura juridică a interferenţei funcţionale a principiului echităţii cu principiul legalităţii. In: Studii Juridice Universitare, 2021, nr. 1, pp. 109-131. ISSN 1857-4122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5639434 |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Studii Juridice Universitare | ||||||
Numărul 1 / 2021 / ISSN 1857-4122 | ||||||
|
||||||
DOI:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5639434 | ||||||
CZU: 347.1 | ||||||
Pag. 109-131 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
This scientific approach includes an analytical analysis on the link between the principle of equity and the principle of legality made through the prism of the degree of doctrinal recognition and their legal validation, which consequently reflects the diversity of theoretical concepts on those principles. The legal non-recognition of the principles of legality and equity in the modernized Civil Code was the causal support to make a doctrinal inventory regarding the identification of those principles in the realization and defence of civil rights. The conceptual support of this study focused on identifying legal and doctrinal landmarks that validate the interference of these principles and which was detached from their functional aspects and legal inaccuracies that suppress the applicative substitution of the magistrate for situations when the law is obscure or generates unfair situations. The elucidation of the bridges (interconnections) between the principle of equity and the principle of legality allowed the appreciation of the applicative value of each principle in the realization and defence of civil rights and their position in the hierarchy of the system of fundamental principles of law in general and civil law in particular. |
||||||
Cuvinte-cheie principle of equity, principle of legality, principle of proportionality, principle of reasonableness, principle of good faith, fundamental principles, supreme value, rule of law, principiul echității, principiul legalităţii, principiul proporţionalităţii, principiul rezonabilităţii, principiul bunei-credinţe, principiile fundamentale, dreptul la apărare |
||||||
|
Cerif XML Export
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?> <CERIF xmlns='urn:xmlns:org:eurocris:cerif-1.5-1' xsi:schemaLocation='urn:xmlns:org:eurocris:cerif-1.5-1 http://www.eurocris.org/Uploads/Web%20pages/CERIF-1.5/CERIF_1.5_1.xsd' xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' release='1.5' date='2012-10-07' sourceDatabase='Output Profile'> <cfResPubl> <cfResPublId>ibn-ResPubl-141610</cfResPublId> <cfResPublDate>2021-11-01</cfResPublDate> <cfIssue>1</cfIssue> <cfStartPage>109</cfStartPage> <cfISSN>1857-4122</cfISSN> <cfURI>https://ibn.idsi.md/ro/vizualizare_articol/141610</cfURI> <cfTitle cfLangCode='RO' cfTrans='o'>Arhitectura juridică a interferenţei funcţionale a principiului echităţii cu principiul legalităţii</cfTitle> <cfKeyw cfLangCode='RO' cfTrans='o'>principle of equity; principle of legality; principle of proportionality; principle of reasonableness; principle of good faith; fundamental principles; supreme value; rule of law; principiul echității; principiul legalităţii; principiul proporţionalităţii; principiul rezonabilităţii; principiul bunei-credinţe; principiile fundamentale; dreptul la apărare</cfKeyw> <cfAbstr cfLangCode='EN' cfTrans='o'><p>This scientific approach includes an analytical analysis on the link between the principle of equity and the principle of legality made through the prism of the degree of doctrinal recognition and their legal validation, which consequently reflects the diversity of theoretical concepts on those principles. The legal non-recognition of the principles of legality and equity in the modernized Civil Code was the causal support to make a doctrinal inventory regarding the identification of those principles in the realization and defence of civil rights. The conceptual support of this study focused on identifying legal and doctrinal landmarks that validate the interference of these principles and which was detached from their functional aspects and legal inaccuracies that suppress the applicative substitution of the magistrate for situations when the law is obscure or generates unfair situations. The elucidation of the bridges (interconnections) between the principle of equity and the principle of legality allowed the appreciation of the applicative value of each principle in the realization and defence of civil rights and their position in the hierarchy of the system of fundamental principles of law in general and civil law in particular.</p></cfAbstr> <cfAbstr cfLangCode='RO' cfTrans='o'><p>Acest demers ştiinţific cuprinde o analiză analitică asupra legăturii dintre principiul echităţii şi principiul legalităţii realizată prin prisma gradului de recunoaştere doctrinară şi validarea lor legală, ceea ce în consecinţă vine să reflecte şi diversitatea conceptelor teoretice asupra principiilor respective. Nerecunoaşterea legală a principiilor legalităţii şi a echităţii în Codul civil modernizat a constituit suportul cauzalistic de a face o inventariere doctrinară în privinţa identificării principiilor respective la realizarea şi apărarea drepturilor civile. Suportul conceptual al acestui studiu a fost axat pe identificarea reperelor legale şi doctrinare ce vin să valideze interferenţa acestor principii şi care a fost desprinsă din aspectele lor funcţionale şi inadvertenţele legale care le suprimă substituirea aplicativă a magistratului pentru situaţiile când legea este obscură sau generează unele situaţii inechitabile. Elucidarea punţilor (punctelor, reperelor) de legătură între principiul echităţii şi principiul legalităţii a permis aprecierea valorii aplicative a fiecărui principiu în parte la realizarea şi apărarea drepturilor civile şi stabilirea poziţiei acestora în ierarhia sistemului principiilor fundamentale ale dreptului în general şi a dreptului civil în special.</p></cfAbstr> <cfResPubl_Class> <cfClassId>eda2d9e9-34c5-11e1-b86c-0800200c9a66</cfClassId> <cfClassSchemeId>759af938-34ae-11e1-b86c-0800200c9a66</cfClassSchemeId> <cfStartDate>2021-11-01T24:00:00</cfStartDate> </cfResPubl_Class> <cfResPubl_Class> <cfClassId>e601872f-4b7e-4d88-929f-7df027b226c9</cfClassId> <cfClassSchemeId>40e90e2f-446d-460a-98e5-5dce57550c48</cfClassSchemeId> <cfStartDate>2021-11-01T24:00:00</cfStartDate> </cfResPubl_Class> <cfPers_ResPubl> <cfPersId>ibn-person-65600</cfPersId> <cfClassId>49815870-1cfe-11e1-8bc2-0800200c9a66</cfClassId> <cfClassSchemeId>b7135ad0-1d00-11e1-8bc2-0800200c9a66</cfClassSchemeId> <cfStartDate>2021-11-01T24:00:00</cfStartDate> </cfPers_ResPubl> <cfFedId> <cfFedIdId>ibn-doi-141610</cfFedIdId> <cfFedId>10.5281/zenodo.5639434</cfFedId> <cfStartDate>2021-11-01T24:00:00</cfStartDate> <cfFedId_Class> <cfClassId>31d222b4-11e0-434b-b5ae-088119c51189</cfClassId> <cfClassSchemeId>bccb3266-689d-4740-a039-c96594b4d916</cfClassSchemeId> </cfFedId_Class> <cfFedId_Srv> <cfSrvId>5123451</cfSrvId> <cfClassId>eda2b2e2-34c5-11e1-b86c-0800200c9a66</cfClassId> <cfClassSchemeId>5a270628-f593-4ff4-a44a-95660c76e182</cfClassSchemeId> </cfFedId_Srv> </cfFedId> </cfResPubl> <cfPers> <cfPersId>ibn-Pers-65600</cfPersId> <cfPersName_Pers> <cfPersNameId>ibn-PersName-65600-2</cfPersNameId> <cfClassId>55f90543-d631-42eb-8d47-d8d9266cbb26</cfClassId> <cfClassSchemeId>7375609d-cfa6-45ce-a803-75de69abe21f</cfClassSchemeId> <cfStartDate>2021-11-01T24:00:00</cfStartDate> <cfFamilyNames>Rusu</cfFamilyNames> <cfFirstNames>Ion</cfFirstNames> </cfPersName_Pers> </cfPers> <cfSrv> <cfSrvId>5123451</cfSrvId> <cfName cfLangCode='en' cfTrans='o'>CrossRef DOI prefix service</cfName> <cfDescr cfLangCode='en' cfTrans='o'>The service of issuing DOI prefixes to publishers</cfDescr> <cfKeyw cfLangCode='en' cfTrans='o'>persistent identifier; Digital Object Identifier</cfKeyw> </cfSrv> </CERIF>