The role of microelectrode recording during Deep Brain Stimulation of Subthalamic Nucleus in patients with Parkinson’s disease
Închide
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
370 19
Ultima descărcare din IBN:
2024-05-01 20:17
Căutarea după subiecte
similare conform CZU
615.841:616.858-036 (1)
Fizioterapie. Terapie fizică. Radioterapie. Alte tratamente terapeutice non-medicamentoase (299)
Neurologie. Neuropatologie. Sistem nervos (987)
SM ISO690:2012
ANDRUȘCA, Alexandru, GAVRILIUC, Olga, SYNOWITZ, Michael, PASCHEN, Steffen, MEHDORN, Maximilian H., FALK, Daniela, DEUSCHL, Gunther D., HELMERS, Ann Kristin. The role of microelectrode recording during Deep Brain Stimulation of Subthalamic Nucleus in patients with Parkinson’s disease. In: 7th Congress of the Society of Neurologists Issue of the Republic of Moldova, Ed. 7, 16-18 septembrie 2021, Chişinău. Chişinău: Revista Curier Medical, 2021, Vol.64, p. 46. ISSN 2537-6381 (Online).
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
7th Congress of the Society of Neurologists Issue of the Republic of Moldova
Vol.64, 2021
Congresul "7th Congress of the Society of Neurologists Issue of the Republic of Moldova"
7, Chişinău, Moldova, 16-18 septembrie 2021

The role of microelectrode recording during Deep Brain Stimulation of Subthalamic Nucleus in patients with Parkinson’s disease

CZU: 615.841:616.858-036

Pag. 46-46

Andrușca Alexandru12, Gavriliuc Olga12, Synowitz Michael3, Paschen Steffen3, Mehdorn Maximilian H.3, Falk Daniela3, Deuschl Gunther D.3, Helmers Ann Kristin3
 
1 Diomid Gherman Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery,
2 ”Nicolae Testemițanu” State University of Medicine and Pharmacy,
3 UKSH, Campus Kiel
 
Proiecte:
 
Disponibil în IBN: 28 septembrie 2021


Rezumat

Background: Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus improves symptoms of Parkinson’s disease. However, the clinical outcome depends on the accurate location of the final electrode. Multiple microelectrode recording is believed to improve the precision, although it prolongs the duration of surgery. We hypothesize that patients implanted in the central trajectory have the same outcome as patients implanted decentrally. Material and methods: This study was carried out in UKSH Kiel and included 556 patients treated from 1999 until 2018 with bilateral STN-DBS (safety population). Pre- and postoperative efficacy data were available from 400 patients. The outcome parameter was the stimulation-induced improvement of the UPDRS for PD. We compared patients with both electrodes centrally to that bi-decentrally. The rate of surgical complications was determined with postoperative imaging. Results: A decentral tract was chosen in 41% of the electrodes (central, n = 471 electrodes; decentral, n = 329). Motor improvement was not different between patients with electrodes implanted bicentral (44.39% ± 22.71) or decentral (43.22% ± 17) trajectory bilaterally (p = 0.5571). Similar results were obtained for the hemi body score and subscores for akinesia, tremor, rigidity, postural instability and gait disorder. The overall bleeding rate was 2.78% and not dependent on the number of penetrations. Conclusions: Outcomes between the groups did not differ and, therefore, the use of mMER is likely to improve the outcome. Comparison with other cohorts does not disclose a higher rate of bleeding complications in this cohort with mMER.

Cuvinte-cheie
STN, DBS, mMER, Outcome, complications