Nasal polyps with atypical stromal cells – a histopathological diagnostic dilemma
Închide
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
460 1
Ultima descărcare din IBN:
2022-01-27 00:48
SM ISO690:2012
CARAUSU, Vadim Costin, OPREA, Raluca Corina, BALAN, Teodora. Nasal polyps with atypical stromal cells – a histopathological diagnostic dilemma. In: MedEspera: International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors, Ed. 8th edition, 24-26 septembrie 2020, Chişinău. Chisinau, Republic of Moldova: 2020, 8, p. 35. ISBN 978-9975-151-11-5.
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
MedEspera
8, 2020
Congresul "International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors"
8th edition, Chişinău, Moldova, 24-26 septembrie 2020

Nasal polyps with atypical stromal cells – a histopathological diagnostic dilemma


Pag. 35-35

Carausu Vadim Costin, Oprea Raluca Corina, Balan Teodora
 
University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa”, Iasi
 
 
Disponibil în IBN: 18 decembrie 2020


Rezumat

Background. Nasal polyps represent inflammatory non-neoplastic masses of the nasal mucosa that affect 1% to 4% of the general population. They typically occur in individuals older than 20 years, having a higher incidence in males and frequently accompany rhinosinusitis. Case report. We report a case of a 67-year-old woman with a known sleep apnea syndrome, persistent right nasal obstruction, seromucous rhinorrhea, symptomatology with an insidious evolution of about 6 months before the examination. The clinical exam showed a translucent, polypoid appearance, which extended from the level of the right to the left choanal orifice. Gross examination of the surgical specimen revealed a large, firm, white, polypoid mass. Microscopic examination showed large stromal bizarre appearing cells with elongated, hyperchromatic nuclei, surrounded by apparently normal epithelium. In this case, atypical stellate cells scattered throughout myxomatous or edematous stroma can be easily mistaken for a malignant process. Histological changes of spindle shape fibroblasts might be erroneously interpreted as certain pseudosarcomatous changes, low-grade sarcomas, rhabdomyosarcoma, sinonasal myxomas, neurofibroma, and nasopharyngeal angiofibroma. We want to emphasize that the major diagnostic problem could derive from the difficulty of differentiating an allergic or infectious reactive process from mesenchymal or neural origin lesions, due to an extensive proliferation of histiocytes, fibroblasts or irregular myofibroblasts. Another differential diagnosis that could have been considered is a long history of a previously biopsied mass with reactive proliferative stromal cells that can mimic malignancy, represented in our case by the reactive nature of the identified fibroblasts and histiocytes atypia. Conclusions. Although the need for histopathological examination of nasal polyps is controversial, this diagnosis is encouraged, given that there are entities more severe than polyps, requiring examination to avoid a misdiagnosis of mesenchymal malignancy. Rigorous medical history associated with clinical data is important for appropriate patient management.

Cuvinte-cheie
nasal polyps, atypical stromal cells, pseudosarcomatous change