The comparative analysis of image restoration represented as a matrix and as a vector using feed forward neural networks
Close
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
120 0
SM ISO690:2012
MARDARE, Igor, PERJU, Veacheslav, CASASENT, David P., GHINCUL, Olga. The comparative analysis of image restoration represented as a matrix and as a vector using feed forward neural networks. In: Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, Ed. 20, 16-17 aprilie 2009, Orlando, Florida. Bellingham, Washington: SPIE, 2009, Ediţia 20, Vol.7340, pp. 1-10. ISBN 9780819476067. ISSN 0277-786X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.819268
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
Ediţia 20, Vol.7340, 2009
Conferința "Optical Pattern Recognition"
20, Orlando, Florida, Statele Unite ale Americii, 16-17 aprilie 2009

The comparative analysis of image restoration represented as a matrix and as a vector using feed forward neural networks

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1117/12.819268

Pag. 1-10

Mardare Igor1, Perju Veacheslav12, Casasent David P.3, Ghincul Olga1
 
1 Technical University of Moldova,
2 Free International University of Moldova,
3 Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA
 
 
Disponibil în IBN: 30 noiembrie 2023


Rezumat

This work contains the results of the experiments on the restoration of the defective images proceeded in a matrix and a vector form with the help of the feed forward neural network. Sometimes it is convenient to represent an image as a vector rather than as a matrix. So the target of this work is to show experimentally what kind of input provides a better restoration, judging from the Euclid's distance of the output of a trained network. This work also shows the differences between processing different types of image presentation of the neuron network. Making a comparative analysis of a matrix and a vector form of presenting the images which are proceeded to a feed forward network allows stating some specific characteristics of a network. These characteristics include the optimal architecture of a network, the number of layers, the number of neurons in each layer and the time of an image restoration. Taking into account the network's characteristics and the most important factor - the Euclid's distance, are drawn conclusions that concern what is the best way of representing images that we want to restore using a feed forward network

Cuvinte-cheie
Resilient feed forward network, Restoration of images, Vector and matrix representation