Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
353 1 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2021-04-18 00:04 |
SM ISO690:2012 PÂNTEA, Diana. Conturarea unor dileme etice în neurochirurgia contemporană. In: Congresul consacrat aniversării a 75-a de la fondarea Universității de Stat de Medicină şi Farmacie „Nicolae Testemiţanu”, 21-23 octombrie 2020, Chişinău. Chişinău: USMF, 2020, p. 98. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Congresul consacrat aniversării a 75-a de la fondarea Universității de Stat de Medicină şi Farmacie „Nicolae Testemiţanu” 2020 | ||||||
Congresul "Congresul consacrat aniversării a 75-a de la fondarea Universității de Stat de Medicină şi Farmacie „Nicolae Testemiţanu”" Chişinău, Moldova, 21-23 octombrie 2020 | ||||||
|
||||||
Pag. 98-98 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
Background. The modern neurosurgery is developed based on the principles of biomedical bioethics: respect for autonomy, non-harm, benefit and justice. As technical capacities in this area increase, they begin to unbalance this basis and increasingly affect moral limits, leading to important ethical dilemmas. Objective of the study. Analysis and elucidation of the interaction and contradiction between the increasingly sophisticated technologizing process of neurosurgery, on the one hand, and bioethical principles on the other. Material and Methods. Scientific sources, national and international reference publications were used to conduct this study, and the incidence of certain topic-specific terms addressed on the medscap.com website was verified and analyzed. The methods were used: bioethics, analytics, biostatistics, comparative, descriptive methods as well. Results. Due to the widespread use of over-technological methods in neurosurgery, there have appeared contradictions related to: the increasingly distinct difference between the doctor and the patient, the reduction in the time of interaction of the doctor with the patient; ignoring the patient's clinic and personality; commercial temptations; fetishizing neuroimagistic data and ignoring the case history of the patient, clinical data and patient personality. As a result, all these aspects warn us about the atrophy of the neurosurgeon's clinical thinking, the distancing, even the disconnection of the doctor from the patient, the loss of the ability to humanistic examination of the patient. Conclusion. The decision on the tactics of treating a patient must not only be based on technology, but must also contain a solid clinical and bioethicophilosophical basis. A neurosurgeon should not always be just a homo sapiens, but also a homo moralis. |
||||||
Cuvinte-cheie neurosurgery, ethical dilemmas, neuroethics, bioethical principles, neurochirurgie, dileme etice, neuroetică, principii bioetice |
||||||
|