Awareness of sense of collective guilt contributes to positive self-affirmation of an individual and society. In order to identify relevant trends in Ukrainian youth’s consciousness, 582 students were interviewed in five cities of Ukraine. On a 5-point scale of semantic differential, the respondents rated the degree of mutual guilt of 41 pairs of communication subjects: themselves and 12 people from their immediate environment (e.g. “I – My mother”), 17 pairs of large social groups (“Youth – Older Generation”), 12 pairs of ethno-political subjects (“Ukrainians – Moldovans”). Assessing the relationship between Ukrainians and Moldovans, the majority of respondents chose a neutral rating of 3 points (66.8%) or avoided an answer (19.2%). A small part attributed a higher degree of guilt to Ukrainians (4%) or Moldovans (10%). The tendency to accuse Moldovans correlates with interpersonal accusations against credible tutors, spouses, and friends, that is, close equal partners. In intergroup relations, correlations can be traced to the accusations against ideological opponents – residents of the Crimea and Donbas, Russian-speaking citizens of Ukraine, the Soviet government, the Russian government led by Putin, and the Ukrainian authorities from 1991 to 2014. According the ethno-political subjects, the accusations against Moldovans correlate with the assessments of all groups included in the list – from Russians (r = .28) to Bulgarians (r = .76). Five factors with a total dispersion of 81.9% stood out based on these indicators. Moldovans' guilt assessments with a load of 0.58 were included in the first factor “accusations against traditional neighbors” (55%; together with accusations against Poles, Slovaks and Czechs, Hungarians, Belarusians, and Romanians), and with a load of 0.61 in the second factor “accusations against southern neighbors” (8.5%; there were also the estimates of Crimean Tatars, Turks, and Bulgarians). Each of the five options for the questionnaire was supplemented with a separate set of psychological techniques (19 in total) aimed at measuring personal and communicative qualities. Using correlation analysis, the relationships between the tendency to blame Moldovans and other indicators were identified. Significant correlations were found only with individual indicators (53 of 691), not with scales. Through expert evaluation, these indicators were distributed on the "Big Five" scales. As a result, a positive relationship between the tendency to blame Moldovans and extraversion was found in 5 out of 11 cases, agreeableness – in 7 out of 15, conscientiousness – in 4 out of 15, neuroticism – in 3 out of 5, and openness to experience – in 2 out of 7. It can be assumed that the lack of both conscientiousness and openness to experience increases the accusatory attitudes towards Moldovans.