Analiza contrastiva versus analiza erorilor
Închide
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
517 17
Ultima descărcare din IBN:
2024-01-26 19:24
SM ISO690:2012
CELPAN-PATIC, Natalia. Analiza contrastiva versus analiza erorilor. In: Probleme ale ştiinţelor socioumanistice şi modernizării învăţământului : Conferința științifică anuală a profesorilor și cercetătorilor UPS „Ion Creangă”, Ed. 17, 20 martie 2015, Chișinău. Chișinău, Republica Moldova: CEP UPS „I.Creangă”, 2015, Seria 17, Vol.2, pp. 114-119. ISBN 978-9975-46-240-2.
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
Probleme ale ştiinţelor socioumanistice şi modernizării învăţământului
Seria 17, Vol.2, 2015
Conferința "Probleme ale ştiinţelor socioumanistice şi modernizării învăţământului "
17, Chișinău, Moldova, 20 martie 2015

Analiza contrastiva versus analiza erorilor


Pag. 114-119

Celpan-Patic Natalia
 
Universitatea Pedagogică de Stat „Ion Creangă“ din Chişinău
 
 
Disponibil în IBN: 4 martie 2019


Rezumat

this succint research we will start from the idea promoted as early as the Enlightenment era by the philosopher J.-J Rousseau in the eighteenth century. According to Rousseau, in the teaching process, the teacher must take into account not only the specifics of age or group, but also the individual ones. In other words, each student is entitled to an individual approach when studying. In this context we support the idea that contrastive analysis and error analysis can be useful both for teacher and student in the teaching/studying/evaluation process. Even the researcher Vigotskii was mentioning the close connection between language and speech. Therefore, the person who is learning a foreign language far away from a real context is first thinking in her native language and then formulating the structures in the foreign language. It is here that interferences occur, i.e. errors caused by modeling of structures from the native to the foreign language.