Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
73 2 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2024-05-09 19:43 |
SM ISO690:2012 BICEC, Iuliana. Criteriile de argumentare a protocolului de tratament endodontic. In: Sănătatea, medicina și bioetica în societatea contemporană: Studii inter și pluridisciplinare, Ed. Ediția a 6-a, 6-7 octombrie 2023, Chişinău. Chișinău, Republica Moldova: "Print-Caro" SRL, 2023, Ediția a 6-a, pp. 272-277. ISBN 978-9975-82-334-0.. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Sănătatea, medicina și bioetica în societatea contemporană Ediția a 6-a, 2023 |
||||||
Conferința "Sănătatea, medicina şi bioetica în societatea contemporană: studii inter şi pluridisciplinare" Ediția a 6-a, Chişinău, Moldova, 6-7 octombrie 2023 | ||||||
|
||||||
Pag. 272-277 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
The goal of endodontic treatment is to debride and clear the root canal system of infected pulp tissue so that the canal space can be shaped and prepared to be filled with an inert material, thereby preventing or minimizing any chance of reinfection. However, failure occurs when endodontic treatment does not meet clinical standards and principles. Two approaches have been proposed to solve this problem. In the first approach, residual bacteria are eliminated or prevented from repopulating the canal system by inserting a dressing into the root canal, in an additional visit, generally falling into the following categories: phenolic derivatives (eugenol, paramonochlorophenol camphorate, phenol camphorate, metacresyl acetate , creosote from beech wood), aldehydes (formocresol), halogens (potassium iodide), calcium hydroxide, antibiotics or other combinations. The decision on the treatment tactics remains at the choice of the dentist, depending on the clinical condition, the general condition of the patient, the technical possibilities and the materials at his disposal, as well as his experience. |
||||||
|