Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
463 32 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2024-04-25 21:26 |
SM ISO690:2012 BECK, Joachim. Open Government and Cross-border Cooperation – Perspectives for the Context of Transnational Policy-Making in Border Regions. In: Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days , Ed. 6, 5-8 mai 2021, Budapesta. Viena, Austria: Facultas Verlags- und Buchhandels, 2021, pp. 141-159. ISBN 978-3-7089-2121-1; 978-3-903035-30-0. ISSN 2520-3401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24989/ocg.v341.10 |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days 2021 | ||||||
Conferința "Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days " 6, Budapesta, Ungaria, 5-8 mai 2021 | ||||||
|
||||||
DOI:https://doi.org/10.24989/ocg.v341.10 | ||||||
Pag. 141-159 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
Open Government (OG) as a concept for modernising the public sector is becoming increasingly prominent in recent debates in administrative science. It refers to a model of government and administrative action which, guided by the three premises of transparency, participation and collaboration, shapes the development and implementation of public policies in close interaction with actors from civil society, business and science. OG thus is not necessarily something completely new, but rather follows the tradition of various reform discourses in administrative science: On the one hand, it shows references to concepts of state theory that postulate a development from the democratic state of the 1950s, the active state of the 1960s, the lean state of the 1970s and 1980s, the activating state of the 1990s towards the digital state of the 2000s. On the other hand, with regard to normative models of public administration, in contrast to autonomous and hierarchical administration, it can be classified between the idea of a cooperative and a responsive administration (cf. [1], pp. 253). At the municipal level, the concept is connectable to concepts that see an evolutionary development from the regulatory municipality of the 1950s and 1960s, the social security municipality of the 1970s, the service municipality of the 1990s to the civic municipality of the 2000s [2]. Finally, it is relatively easy to also establish references to the more recent debates on the topos of regional governance [3], [40]. |
||||||
|