Conţinutul numărului revistei |
Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
278 0 |
Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
821.135.1:1(498)”19”BlagaL. (1) |
Литература на балканских романских языках (2104) |
ФИЛОСОФИЯ. ПСИХОЛОГИЯ (4645) |
SM ISO690:2012 ȘENDRESCU, Ramona. Contemporaries from Gândirea. Separation from Blaga. In: Journal of Social Sciences, 2021, vol. 4, nr. 3, pp. 55-59. ISSN 2587-3490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52326/jss.utm.2021.4(3).06 |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Journal of Social Sciences | ||||||
Volumul 4, Numărul 3 / 2021 / ISSN 2587-3490 /ISSNe 2587-3504 | ||||||
|
||||||
DOI:https://doi.org/10.52326/jss.utm.2021.4(3).06 | ||||||
CZU: 821.135.1:1(498)”19”BlagaL. | ||||||
Pag. 55-59 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
This paper is part of the PhD Thesis: Essays of Lucian Blaga and we want to show how the Romanian philosopher, one of the founders of the literary magazine „Gândirea”, the most published and admired author of this traditionalist journal, was only tolerated in the pages of „Gândirea” because he never accepted the concept of art and popular tradition stipulated in the ideological program imposed by Nichifor Crainic. The causes and the consequences of this separation can be found in Blaga's personal correspondence with his friends. |
||||||
Cuvinte-cheie culture, dogmatic, modernism, polemics, religion, tradition, spirituality, cultură, dogmă, modernism, polemici, religie, tradiţie, spiritualitate |
||||||
|
Dublin Core Export
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?> <oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/' xmlns:oai_dc='http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/' xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' xsi:schemaLocation='http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd'> <dc:creator>Șendrescu, R.</dc:creator> <dc:date>2021-09-20</dc:date> <dc:description xml:lang='en'><p>This paper is part of the PhD Thesis: Essays of Lucian Blaga and we want to show how the Romanian philosopher, one of the founders of the literary magazine „Gândirea”, the most published and admired author of this traditionalist journal, was only tolerated in the pages of „Gândirea” because he never accepted the concept of art and popular tradition stipulated in the ideological program imposed by Nichifor Crainic. The causes and the consequences of this separation can be found in Blaga's personal correspondence with his friends.</p></dc:description> <dc:description xml:lang='ro'><p>Acest articol face parte din teza de doctorat: Eseistica lui Lucian Blaga. Dorim să arătăm cum filosoful român, unul dintre fondatorii revistei literare „Gândirea”, cel mai publicat și admirat autor al acestei reviste tradiționaliste, a fost doar tolerat în paginile „Gândirii” pentru că Blaga nu a acceptat niciodată conceptul de artă și tradiție populară stipulat în programul ideologic impus de Nichifor Crainic. Cauzele și consecințele acestei separări pot fi găsite în corespondența personală a lui Blaga cu prietenii săi.</p></dc:description> <dc:identifier>10.52326/jss.utm.2021.4(3).06</dc:identifier> <dc:source>Journal of Social Sciences (3) 55-59</dc:source> <dc:subject>culture</dc:subject> <dc:subject>dogmatic</dc:subject> <dc:subject>modernism</dc:subject> <dc:subject>polemics</dc:subject> <dc:subject>religion</dc:subject> <dc:subject>tradition</dc:subject> <dc:subject>spirituality</dc:subject> <dc:subject>cultură</dc:subject> <dc:subject>dogmă</dc:subject> <dc:subject>modernism</dc:subject> <dc:subject>polemici</dc:subject> <dc:subject>religie</dc:subject> <dc:subject>tradiţie</dc:subject> <dc:subject>spiritualitate</dc:subject> <dc:title>Contemporaries from Gândirea. Separation from Blaga</dc:title> <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type> </oai_dc:dc>