Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
732 5 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2023-03-06 16:23 |
SM ISO690:2012 BELOBROV, Angela. Principles and Norms of an Effective Multiple Choice Test Construction with the Aim of Evaluating the Knowledge in the Economic and Financial Areas . In: Professional Education and Economic Needs of the Black Sea Region, 24 aprilie 2015, Chişinău. Chişinău: Departamentul Editorial-Poligrafic al ASEM, 2015, pp. 47-54. ISBN 978-9975-75-786-7. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Professional Education and Economic Needs of the Black Sea Region 2015 | ||||||
Conferința "Professional Education and Economic Needs of the Black Sea Region" Chişinău, Moldova, 24 aprilie 2015 | ||||||
|
||||||
Pag. 47-54 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
In the narrow sense, quality education is a superset of quality curriculum, quality teaching, quality books (methodical materials), quality practices and a qualitative evaluation. This research refers to the main problems of effective construction of multiple choice tests to assess knowledge in economic and financial field, as a form a qualitative evaluation used in majority of universities and institution of vocational education and training in the world. Multiple choice testing is an efficient and effective way to assess a wide range of knowledge, skills, attitudes, abilities, values, thinking skills, etc. Multiple choice testing brings an efficiency and economy of scale that can be indispensable. Because students can respond to dozens of questions in a class period, it allows broad coverage of content. Multiple-choice items are flexible enough to tap nearly any level of Bloom’s taxonomy. Of course, these advantages only accrue when the items are well written and the test well constructed. That takes time, planning, creativity, and thoughtfulness. |
||||||
Cuvinte-cheie quality of education, knowledge evaluation, multiple choice tests, effective construction of multiple choice tests, importance of recommended lists of basis literature |
||||||
|