| Articolul precedent |
| Articolul urmator |
 |
 665 12 |
| Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2023-03-18 00:09 |
 SM ISO690:2012CRISTEA, Dan. Natural Language Processing versus Logic. Pros and cons on the dispute whether logic is useful in the computational interpretation of language. In: Conference on Mathematical Foundations of Informatics, Ed. 2016, 25-30 iulie 2016, Chișinău. Chișinău, Republica Moldova: "VALINEX" SRL, 2016, pp. 21-37. ISBN 978‐9975‐4237‐4‐8. |
| EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
| Conference on Mathematical Foundations of Informatics 2016 | ||||||
|
Conferința "Conference on Mathematical Foundations of Informatics" 2016, Chișinău, Moldova, 25-30 iulie 2016 | ||||||
|
||||||
| Pag. 21-37 | ||||||
|
||||||
 Descarcă PDF |
||||||
| Rezumat | ||||||
In this essay I express some personal opinions regarding the influence that logic has on modern approaches to process natural language in artificial systems. I start by presenting some successful linguistic formalisms that were originated in logic, arguing why logic is important in conveying the meaning of language expression. Then, I counterbalance the argumentation with a number of examples where logic is impuissant to mirror language usage, finally supporting a rather temperate opinion about the usefulness of logic to formalise low level linguistic processes and about the limits of language formalisation. |
||||||
| Cuvinte-cheie natural language processing (NLP), logic theories in NLP, statistical approaches, symbolic versus statistical approaches in NLP |
||||||
|
|
|
|
