<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/' xmlns:oai_dc='http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/' xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' xsi:schemaLocation='http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd'>
<dc:creator>Gîrlea, O.V.</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-08-01</dc:date>
<dc:description xml:lang='en'>The article sets and comments on the most important theoretical aspects involved in the idea of self-parody. It also traces the lines that divide the concept of self-parody and concepts with which it is in an apparent or essential relationship. It distinguishes between the various interpretations of the autoparodic phenomenon: from the cultural, aesthetic interpretation to postmodern poetic discursive interpretation. The author’s intention is to give back the functionality and applicability of self-parody term in relation to the literary phenomenon which, to a large extent, generates it, and also which, at least in partly, is generated.</dc:description>
<dc:source>Metaliteratură 34 (5-6) 101-106</dc:source>
<dc:subject>self-parody</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>self-pastiche</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>self-plagiarism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>self-parodist</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>self-derision</dc:subject>
<dc:title>Dialogul – artă vs. Erudiţie (despre interviurile lui Vasile Gârneţ de la Contrafort)</dc:title>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>