| Conţinutul numărului revistei |
| Articolul precedent |
| Articolul urmator |
 |
 800 6 |
| Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2020-05-27 20:00 |
 SM ISO690:2012KREKELER, Ruxanda. Sociologia translării. In: Revista de Filosofie, Sociologie şi Ştiinţe Politice, 2013, nr. 3(163), pp. 198-202. ISSN 1957-2294. |
| EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
| Revista de Filosofie, Sociologie şi Ştiinţe Politice | ||||||
| Numărul 3(163) / 2013 / ISSN 1957-2294 | ||||||
|
||||||
| Pag. 198-202 | ||||||
|
||||||
 Descarcă PDF |
||||||
| Rezumat | ||||||
As an example of a social constructivist approach is the actor-network theory considered. Significant representatives of tis theory are Bruno Latour and Michel Callon. This theory sees human and non-human (such as technology) as equal actors in networks that aim to achieve a common goal. Latour says that man must deal with machinery and recruit them as allies. One must not look at society and technology separately, but together as a socio-technology. An issue is the separation of suspensions between nature / society, technology / social and human / non-human actors. The Actor-Network Theory (ANT) breaks with the assumption of most sociologists, to explain the social with the social. The ANT is interested in how non-human things can be part of the social. It is thus assumed equivalence of human and nonhuman
actors. Furthermore, the theory does use a neutral vocabulary as possible to describe the conflicts and interests of the different actors better. |
||||||
|
Dublin Core Export
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?> <oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/' xmlns:oai_dc='http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/' xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' xsi:schemaLocation='http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd'> <dc:creator>Krekeler, R.</dc:creator> <dc:date>2013-11-01</dc:date> <dc:description xml:lang='en'>As an example of a social constructivist approach is the actor-network theory considered. Significant representatives of tis theory are Bruno Latour and Michel Callon. This theory sees human and non-human (such as technology) as equal actors in networks that aim to achieve a common goal. Latour says that man must deal with machinery and recruit them as allies. One must not look at society and technology separately, but together as a socio-technology. An issue is the separation of suspensions between nature / society, technology / social and human / non-human actors. The Actor-Network Theory (ANT) breaks with the assumption of most sociologists, to explain the social with the social. The ANT is interested in how non-human things can be part of the social. It is thus assumed equivalence of human and nonhuman actors. Furthermore, the theory does use a neutral vocabulary as possible to describe the conflicts and interests of the different actors better.</dc:description> <dc:source>Revista de Filosofie, Sociologie şi Ştiinţe Politice 163 (3) 198-202</dc:source> <dc:title>Sociologia translării</dc:title> <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type> </oai_dc:dc>
|
|
|
