Defining the culture as a human condition, the (post) modern philosophy imposes the idea that man produces “different cultural worlds”. As an inherent expression of the spiritual imbued with the political and the social elements, the cultural portrays the epigenetic development of human entities in all of its instances of integrity, unity, but also by those of delimitation, difference and uniqueness. Many philosophical and/or current anthropological approaches and authors like: Edgar Morin, Raimon Panikkar, Raul Fornet-Betancourt, Jacques Demorgon etc. insist, in their own way, on the culturality revision, on the dia-logos of cultures with the intention of (re)finding a (judicious) dialectic of phenomenal triad: man-culturecivilization in order to show a polytrophic complementarity of the dynamic real-rational-relational interface based on three main elements: space-time-society. But in a globalizing world, the dualistic paradigm of the fragmentary, reductionism and disjunctive opposition is outdated and should be substituted by a complex, open and connective paradigm. Further to the above mentioned ideas (and authors), we (re) discover the visionary philosophy of Stéphane Lupasco, who, in our view, has anticipated the current projects, outlining before a trialectic nanography of human nature and its (inter) cultural condition, finding themselves, in one way or another, in recent approaches to the identification of a new modus vivendi and a better world.