Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
327 2 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2024-01-03 20:57 |
SM ISO690:2012 DÎRDALĂ, Lucian Dumitru. Quiet Rejection of Multi-Speed Europe: the Romanian Response to the Project of EU Differentiated Integration. In: 3rd Central and Eastern European LUMEN, 8-10 iunie 2017, Chişinău. Chișinău, Republica Moldova: Editura LUMEN, 2017, pp. 98-99. ISBN 978-973-166-461-3. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
3rd Central and Eastern European LUMEN 2017 | ||||||
Conferința "3rd Central and Eastern European LUMEN" Chişinău, Moldova, 8-10 iunie 2017 | ||||||
|
||||||
Pag. 98-99 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
Romania has been one of the several countries that rejected the concept of ―multi-speed Europe‖ as way forward for the integration process. The Declaration of the anniversary EU summit of 25 March 2017, held in Rome, did not include this metaphor; instead, it included a qualified reference to different paces of integration, where necessary and leaving the door open for those countries that choose to join later. This is yet to alleviate the fears that many Central and Eastern European member-states experience, relative to their possible relegation into a second division of European integration, especially since many of them do not belong to the Euro-zone. In the case of Romania, this adds up to the already widespread feeling of exclusion, since it has not yet been admitted to the Schengen area and is subject to a special Cooperation and Verification Mechanism in the field of judicial reform and the rule of law. The article adopts a comparative approach in order to highlight a number of specific Romanian concerns over the logic of differentiated integration, captured by the ―multi-speed Europe‖ principle. Using discourse analysis and focusing on relevant political elite statements in Central and Eastern Europe, it will be argued that the political establishment in Bucharest, unlike its Polish and Hungarian counterparts, has chosen a less confrontational path. It is a suitable strategy for a country whose political situation prevents its citizens from fully enjoying the benefits of EU membership. |
||||||
Cuvinte-cheie multi-speed Europe, European Union, Romania periphery |
||||||
|
Google Scholar Export
<meta name="citation_title" content="Quiet Rejection of Multi-Speed Europe: the Romanian Response to the Project of EU Differentiated Integration"> <meta name="citation_author" content="Dîrdală Lucian Dumitru"> <meta name="citation_publication_date" content="2017"> <meta name="citation_collection_title" content="3rd Central and Eastern European LUMEN"> <meta name="citation_firstpage" content="98"> <meta name="citation_lastpage" content="99"> <meta name="citation_pdf_url" content="https://ibn.idsi.md/sites/default/files/imag_file/98-99_24.pdf">