Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
499 12 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2024-02-25 16:50 |
Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
341.231.14(4)CtEDO (18) |
Юридические лица и предметы международного права (989) |
SM ISO690:2012 CHIRTOACĂ, Lilia. Jurisprudenţa Curţii Europene a Drepturilor Omului privind protecţia datelor cu caracter personal şi viaţa private. In: State, security and human rights: in condition of information siciety, 13-14 decembrie 2018, Chişinău. Chişinău: Tipografia "Artpoligraf", 2019, pp. 211-216. ISBN 978-9975-108-88-1. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
State, security and human rights 2019 | ||||||
Conferința "Statul, securitatea şi drepturile omului în condiţiile societăţii informaţionale" Chişinău, Moldova, 13-14 decembrie 2018 | ||||||
|
||||||
CZU: 341.231.14(4)CtEDO | ||||||
Pag. 211-216 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
The jurisprudence of the european court of human rights, regarding the protection ofpersonal dataandthat ofprivate life highlightsrelevant practical aspects of the constitution of evidence and the use of specific arguments in the ECHR. For instance, concerning the approach used to solve cases from this field, the jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice is also important, serving as a model for the jurisprudence of ECHR. The jurisprudence of ECJ is appreciated and respectively, recommended as an example of good practice. We, thus, acknowledge the possibility to consolidate the protection in the above-mentioned field and to exclude the abusive practices by using jurisprudence and comparative strategies. The cases from the judiciary practice of a certain country or judicial system can be valuable to other countries, including the Republic of Moldova, by presenting effective judiciary solutions. ECHR is the authority responsible of interpreting the Convention of Human Rights,the two of them representing a whole. |
||||||
Cuvinte-cheie the jurisprudence ECHR, the protection, the protection of personal data, private life, good practice, the cases from the judiciary practice |
||||||
|