<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<resource xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' xmlns='http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3' xsi:schemaLocation='http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-3/metadata.xsd'>
<creators>
<creator>
<creatorName>Zarişneac, L.</creatorName>
<affiliation>Universitatea de Stat „Alecu Russo” din Bălţi, Moldova, Republica</affiliation>
</creator>
</creators>
<titles>
<title xml:lang='ro'>Evaluarea profesională a funcţionarilor publici</title>
</titles>
<publisher>Instrumentul Bibliometric National</publisher>
<publicationYear>2013</publicationYear>
<relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType='ISBN' relationType='IsPartOf'>978-9975-50-106-4</relatedIdentifier>
<subjects>
<subject>civil servant</subject>
<subject>professional evaluation</subject>
<subject>public authority</subject>
<subject>evaluation procedure</subject>
<subject>evaluation commission</subject>
<subject schemeURI='http://udcdata.info/' subjectScheme='UDC'>35.082</subject>
</subjects>
<dates>
<date dateType='Issued'>2013</date>
</dates>
<resourceType resourceTypeGeneral='Text'>Conference Paper</resourceType>
<descriptions>
<description xml:lang='en' descriptionType='Abstract'><p>The following article reflects one of the main themes met in the public administration sphere: professional evaluation of civil servants. It refers to the evaluation method, terms, involved factors and consequences. Also, there is a series of problems as: wrong application of the procedure, ineffective use of time and resources, the absence of any feed-back between public authority and civil servant, described in the text.</p></description>
</descriptions>
<formats>
<format>application/pdf</format>
</formats>
</resource>