Conţinutul numărului revistei |
Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
738 11 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2024-04-11 15:00 |
Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
93:327.5:341.24(430+437) (2) |
GEOGRAPHY. BIOGRAPHY. HISTORY (3859) |
International blocs. Tension, conflict (214) |
Persons and things in international law (989) |
SM ISO690:2012 SURZHIK, Dmitry. Munich Agreement: some myths. In: Relaţii internaţionale. Plus, 2018, nr. 2(14), pp. 210-213. ISSN 1857-4440. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Relaţii internaţionale. Plus | ||||||
Numărul 2(14) / 2018 / ISSN 1857-4440 /ISSNe 2587-3393 | ||||||
|
||||||
CZU: 93:327.5:341.24(430+437) | ||||||
Pag. 210-213 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
The article discusses the main distortions of the Munich agreement, concluded on September 30, 1938. On the basis of the definitions of legal science, the author is convinced that the definition of this act is a conspiracy. According to the author, since this action was criminal in the transaction nature between the security guarantors of Czechoslovakia (both directly, through the Locarno Agreements of 1925 - France, and indirectly, by preventing the remilitarization of Germany, under the terms of the Versailles Peace Treaty of 1919 - France and Great Britain). Therefore, the parties that went to an agreement with A. Hitler about the expense of Czechoslovakia, seek to silence, distort this agreement or shift the emphasis on the SovietGerman non-aggression treaty on August 23, 1939. The main myths disseminated in the modern mass media about the 1938 Munich Agreement are discussed below. |
||||||
Cuvinte-cheie international relations, diplomacy, falsification of history, World War II, Munich Agreement |
||||||
|