Conţinutul numărului revistei |
Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
748 2 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2020-05-13 23:21 |
Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
339.13:633.1(4:439) (1) |
General questions of trade and commerce. Market (827) |
Cereals. Grain crops (683) |
SM ISO690:2012 NOGRADI, Judit. Implicarea participanţilor pieţei in intervenţiile de cereale ale UE in Ungaria. In: Economie şi Sociologie, 2014, nr. 3, pp. 201-208. ISSN 1857-4130. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Economie şi Sociologie | ||||||
Numărul 3 / 2014 / ISSN 1857-4130 | ||||||
|
||||||
CZU: 339.13:633.1(4:439) | ||||||
JEL: Q11, Q12, Q13, Q19 | ||||||
Pag. 201-208 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
On the grain market, the increase of prices is the farmer's interest, while fall in prices favours the traders. Using market intervention for price stablization mainly privileges the farmers, as the intervention price is known well before planting, but serves also the traders and end users by providing a predictable market environment. Considering that unlike traders, most grain producers don't have storage capacity at their own disposal, and that the
administrative burden brought forth by the EU's intervention |
||||||
Cuvinte-cheie grâu, porumb, preţul de piaţă, intervenţie pe piaţa de cereale, agricultor |
||||||
|
DataCite XML Export
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?> <resource xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' xmlns='http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3' xsi:schemaLocation='http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-3/metadata.xsd'> <creators> <creator> <creatorName>Nogradi, J.</creatorName> <affiliation>Universitatea din Pannonia, Ungaria, Ungaria</affiliation> </creator> </creators> <titles> <title xml:lang='en'>Implicarea participanţilor pieţei in intervenţiile de cereale ale UE in Ungaria</title> </titles> <publisher>Instrumentul Bibliometric National</publisher> <publicationYear>2014</publicationYear> <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType='ISSN' relationType='IsPartOf'>1857-4130</relatedIdentifier> <subjects> <subject>grâu</subject> <subject>porumb</subject> <subject>intervenţie pe piaţa de cereale</subject> <subject>preţul de piaţă</subject> <subject>agricultor</subject> <subject schemeURI='http://udcdata.info/' subjectScheme='UDC'>339.13:633.1(4:439)</subject> </subjects> <dates> <date dateType='Issued'>2014-08-01</date> </dates> <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral='Text'>Journal article</resourceType> <descriptions> <description xml:lang='en' descriptionType='Abstract'>On the grain market, the increase of prices is the farmer's interest, while fall in prices favours the traders. Using market intervention for price stablization mainly privileges the farmers, as the intervention price is known well before planting, but serves also the traders and end users by providing a predictable market environment. Considering that unlike traders, most grain producers don't have storage capacity at their own disposal, and that the administrative burden brought forth by the EU's intervention</description> <description xml:lang='en' descriptionType='Abstract'>on the grain market encumbered the participation in the measure, I presume, that a larger proportion of traders could be involved in the measure. My analysis highlights the fact that farmers were able to adapt to the regulations and sell their grain for intervention. This is proven by the fact that for the intervention buying as of the offerers, 60% of the farmers made a bid for selling their produce. Nevertheless, it can be recommended to lay great emphasis on informing the market participants to make them aware of the changes in time. </description> </descriptions> <formats> <format>application/pdf</format> </formats> </resource>