Conţinutul numărului revistei |
Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2024-02-20 12:50 |
Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
321.1+351/354(091) (1) |
Forms of political organization. States as political powers (310) |
Particular activities of public administration (1097) |
Lowest levels of administration. Local government. Municipal administration. Local authorities (2622) |
Middle levels of administration. Regional, provincial government. Regional authorities (4157) |
High level, top level of administration. Central, national government (5814) |
![]() ŞAPTEFRAŢI, Tatiana. Din istoria gândirii despre conducere. In: Administrarea Publică, 2012, nr. 2(74), pp. 20-27. ISSN 1813-8489. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Administrarea Publică | ||||||
Numărul 2(74) / 2012 / ISSN 1813-8489 | ||||||
|
||||||
CZU: 321.1+351/354(091) | ||||||
Pag. 20-27 | ||||||
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
The development of management science had a complex evolution in time and presented different approaches. The study of literature in the field confirms the existence of two major
periods: the prescientific period and the scientific period. A substantial contribution to the knowledge about leadership development in the prescientific period was made by the ancient
Greek philosophers: Homer, Pythagoras, Heraclitus, Protagoras, Socrates, Plato, Aristotle. The scientific period is divided into three sub-periods: the industrial sub-period, the sub-period of analysis and systematization of the results of scientific research in leadership and the information
sub-period. The representatives of the scientific period were: W. Wilson, M. Weber, F. Taylor, H. Fayol. A relevant contribution in the development of leadership science in Moldova has been made by the studies of the researchers M. Platon, A. Simboteanu, T. Deliu. |
||||||
|